Question:
Uh…Dave? Better get another "moniker" Dave M is already taken–by me The real Dave M
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Have a look at http://www.ratfish.com/usual According to Fran Betters who developed the USUAL it should be fished out as a dry and retreived as a wet using short but rapid retrieve. Red or orange thred must be used and keep the dubbing sparse. Good luck Any thoughts? Thanks Rob L Rob, as you’ve noticed, its a good technique. I use a fly called "the Usual" specifically for this. It is a great dry fly, but it becomes an instant emerger when allowed to swing in the current. The next cast, again dry then emerger. I can double my chances of catching fish in this way ’cause I’m fishing two parts of the water column vice one. Frank Reid Frank, do you have a link to "the usual" tying pattern? I’m not savvy enough w/google to narrow down the search… I accidentally stumbled into the same technique with an EHC on the Delaware last week…worked great. — Rob S.
Response:
did the trout do this after a long drift by the dry, or (almost) immediately after the fly hit the water? I would guess the latter, because that initial disturbance gets transmitted quite a long distance, and if the fish is keyed on that, then they will chase…
It was a fairly long drift. It was not as I placed the fly on the water. Tight lines, Brian D. Nelson Diamond N Outfitters, Missoula, Montana www.diamondnoutfitters.com
Response:
thanks! nice description of patterns… Rob –please remuv the ‘NOWAY2it’ from my email addy to email me–
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – A trout can be drawn to a nymph, however a dry fly must pass overhead of the trout in order to be seen. Negative. I’ve had a Brown trout come from 6+ feet downstream (about like the Nautilus in Disney’s classic "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea") to intercept a dry fly (parachute hopper). Looked like a dad gum freight train! Granted, that ain’t the normal way of the trout but it did it….. in front of witnesses, too. We were fishing from a boat. Tight lines, Brian D. Nelson Diamond N Outfitters, Missoula, Montana www.diamondnoutfitters.com
did the trout do this after a long drift by the dry, or (almost) immediately after the fly hit the water? I would guess the latter, because that initial disturbance gets transmitted quite a long distance, and if the fish is keyed on that, then they will chase… Just curious… — Rob
Response:
A trout can be drawn to a nymph, however a dry fly must pass overhead of the trout in order to be seen. Negative. I’ve had a Brown trout come from 6+ feet downstream (about like the Nautilus in Disney’s classic "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea") to intercept a dry fly (parachute hopper). Looked like a dad gum freight train! Granted, that ain’t the normal way of the trout but it did it….. in front of witnesses, too. We were fishing from a boat.
There are exceptions to most rules, and I too have found that now and then a trout will hunt down a floating dun or sedge; it is generally the surface disturbance that alerts the trout to the remote insect’s presence, and that is why we drag our sedges to provoke a response ~ the induced take. You mention a parachute hopper; this fly is much more visible to a trout than a regular dry fly ~ parachuted flies have a greater portion of fly that is fished subsurface than that of standard hackled dries. During the E. danica hatch, it is surprising how many duns manage to inadvertantly evade a trout when the nymphal shuck has just been removed. The trout usually go for the shuck in a violent rise, and the floating dun is left to make his leisurely escape. I assume that the trout saw the shuck a lot more clearly than the floating dun (as the shuck is subsurface), and went for that instead of the real bit of ephemeral protein. However, given that the floating natural fly is apt to make good his airborne escape, the trout are thus less inclined to waste a journey to a morcel that may escape his jaws. With a nymph such as the PT (which imitates the nymph in the later instars as opposed to a nymph in its hatching to dun phase) the trout knows that he has plenty of time to chase down and eat the hapless nymph: the snack is more or less guaranteed (unless another trout gets to the nymph first) and the journey after it is well worth it indeed. That is why when fishing deep nymphs such as the PT, the takes are a lot less violent and there is very little water disturbance (boils & bulges) to alert the angler. This is where the bite indicator, or my preferred greased leader comes into its own. The trout don’t really need to rush to the nymph, they merely cruise it down. I find that trout are more inclined to hunt the PT nymph down over the GRHE / rabbit fur nymph. I reckon that this is due to the trout believing that the GRHE nymph is soon to hatch out and fly off, and so he is more cautious with distance , but at closer distances the trout fairly whallops the GRHE, seemingly in great haste to secure his meal. The hook holds of the two flies also seem to bear this theory out too, as the PT is an apex of the jaw snagger, whereas the GRHE is a scissor snagger much like that of a dry fly. I spy rises to my GRHEs by the disturbances in the water, or the golden flash as the trout rapidly turns after seizing the fly. In reflected light and in turbulent water, I use the greased leader to detect bites with the GRHE / rabbit fur nymph, as the other methods are more difficult to practice in these situations. Obviously, when the fly is less than 12 " deep, the surface splash of the diving trout is enough to know when to lift the rod or pull in the line to set the hook. (for utter butchery on a stream you can use an E. danica nymph, but the fun of using it is more or less inversely proportional to the number of fish that you catch whilst using it in late May) Regards, Michael.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – This isn’t correct. The dryfly floating outside of the trout’s window will still indent the surface film and make an impression in the "mirrored" part of the trout’s field of view. Trout do recognise that food items do this and it is one of the most important factors to be considered when designing/tying dryflies. This is often what the trout will come to and then either take or refuse once the fly is in full view. The field of view for a trout to detect a nymph or a dryfly is virtually the same. I have had trout come over 12 feet for large terrestrials. It is also depth dependant in that the deeper the fish lies the larger its window of full view.
You are correct in the depth enlarging the window issue, but I am am right in saying that the sunk fly is *vastly* more visible than the floating fly. I have done a lot of diving and snorkelling and have seen this effect for myself.
Response:
Brian Nelson writes: Negative. I’ve had a Brown trout come from 6+ feet downstream (about like the Nautilus in Disney’s classic "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea") to intercept a dry fly (parachute hopper). Looked like a dad gum freight train! Granted, that ain’t the normal way of the trout but it did it….. in front of witnesses, too. We were fishing from a boat. Tight lines, Brian D. Nelson Diamond N Outfitters, Missoula, Montana www.diamondnoutfitters.com
I’ve seen the same thing happen with Landlocked Salmon and Brookies. I’ve had a Brookie swim forward three or so feet to take a size 20 Jail Bird floating midge. Dave
Response:
This isn’t correct. The dryfly floating outside of the trout’s window will still indent the surface film and make an impression in the "mirrored" part of the trout’s field of view. Trout do recognise that food items do this and it is one of the most important factors to be considered when designing/tying dryflies. This is often what the trout will come to and then either take or refuse once the fly is in full view. The field of view for a trout to detect a nymph or a dryfly is virtually the same. I have had trout come over 12 feet for large terrestrials. It is also depth dependant in that the deeper the fish lies the larger its window of full view. Clark
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Rob L writes: (snip) Normally I have had fish take the dries on the surface, not underneath. Any thoughts? This is a common occurence with land locked salmon. After the drag free drift, the fly is left to swing down and around, then stripped back slowly. They will hit it on the swing (it’s moving pretty quickly), or on the retrieve. While fishing on a river in Maine from a boat, my grandson caught fish after fish on a Goddard Caddis dragged in the current. Since I was netting his fish, I didn’t fish much. <G I have also seen brook trout take a fly like this. An emerger? Bait fish struggling? The subsurface fly is a lot more visible to the trout than one floating on the surface. With a dry fly, the trout’s window of observation is very limited due to the reflective nature of the surface of the water (it works both sides of the water too, and just as we see sky and so on reflected off the surface, the trout & other fish see reflected riverbed at angles beyond the refraction / reflection limit). This aspect of visibility to the trout is one reason why I really like to use the nymph over the dry fly in a lot of places. A trout can be drawn to a nymph, however a dry fly must pass overhead of the trout in order to be seen. Parachute flies and Klinkhamers do manage to be seen better than most dryflies though, and that is because part of the fly has managed to penetrate the surface tension and become more visible to the trout. Regards, Mike.
Response:
Have a look at http://www.ratfish.com/usual According to Fran Betters who developed the USUAL it should be fished out as a dry and retreived as a wet using short but rapid retrieve. Red or orange thred must be used and keep the dubbing sparse. Good luck – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Any thoughts? Thanks Rob L Rob, as you’ve noticed, its a good technique. I use a fly called "the Usual" specifically for this. It is a great dry fly, but it becomes an instant emerger when allowed to swing in the current. The next cast, again dry then emerger. I can double my chances of catching fish in this way ’cause I’m fishing two parts of the water column vice one. Frank Reid Frank, do you have a link to "the usual" tying pattern? I’m not savvy enough w/google to narrow down the search… I accidentally stumbled into the same technique with an EHC on the Delaware last week…worked great. — Rob S.
Response:
A trout can be drawn to a nymph, however a dry fly must pass overhead of the trout in order to be seen.
Negative. I’ve had a Brown trout come from 6+ feet downstream (about like the Nautilus in Disney’s classic "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea") to intercept a dry fly (parachute hopper). Looked like a dad gum freight train! Granted, that ain’t the normal way of the trout but it did it….. in front of witnesses, too. We were fishing from a boat. Tight lines, Brian D. Nelson Diamond N Outfitters, Missoula, Montana www.diamondnoutfitters.com
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Virtually every pattern I’ve done this with has caught some fish. That said, some do work better than others…..or so it appears to me, anyway. The EHC has always been superb used in this way as well as in it’s more customary role as a dry fly. Pass lakes also work very well. Surprisingly, I’ve caught less fish using streamers this way than with dries or designated emerger patterns. Brookies are typically more susceptible than browns or rainbows….. I’ll add a brown to the list, caught on a Royal Wulff, tho I confess it was more by accident than intent.
Oh, I’ve caught plenty of the others this way, but brookies definitely fall prey more often……probably because they’re easier anyway. I rarely use this method deliberately with the intent of catching more fish. Frankly, it isn’t the most interesting way to catch fish. It is more often a matter of letting the fly dangle rather than reeling up all the line only to have to strip it off again when it’s my turn to fish. This is especially true in those situations when the fish are feeding aggressively. I’ve often found myself in situations where a partner will get a fish on while I’m still releasing one, and vice versa…..sometimes it isn’t worth the time to put the line back on the reel. Wolfgang
Response:
I don’t have a Google link–but here’s the pattern: Hook: Tiemco 100 or Daiichi 1100 or Mustad 94840 Size 12 to 22 Thread 8/0 Uni-thread color Red; Orange; Light Cahill; Gray Tail: Clump of snowshoe hare (from the heel of the foot) Body: Snowshoe hare dubbing (thread color shows through when wet–plan accordingly) Wing: Snowshoe Hare clump tied upright (Mayfly) or down-wing style (Caddis) The only way to fish it "wrong" is to leave it in your flybox. Enjoy HINT: Use a "Usual" as your point fly–tie in 18 inches of flourocarbon at the bend of the hook–and hang a LaFontaine Deep Sparkle Pupa off it. Deadly effective. Dave M
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Any thoughts? Thanks Rob L Rob, as you’ve noticed, its a good technique. I use a fly called "the Usual" specifically for this. It is a great dry fly, but it becomes an instant emerger when allowed to swing in the current. The next cast, again dry then emerger. I can double my chances of catching fish in this way ’cause I’m fishing two parts of the water column vice one. Frank Reid Frank, do you have a link to "the usual" tying pattern? I’m not savvy enough w/google to narrow down the search… I accidentally stumbled into the same technique with an EHC on the Delaware last week…worked great. — Rob S.
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I accidentally stumbled into the same technique with an EHC on the Delaware last week…worked great. I’ve used this method successfully with dozens of patterns while watching a partner fish. I typically just leave the bug in the water with a bunch of line out while watching. Virtually every pattern I’ve done this with has caught some fish. That said, some do work better than others…..or so it appears to me, anyway. The EHC has always been superb used in this way as well as in it’s more customary role as a dry fly. Pass lakes also work very well. Surprisingly, I’ve caught less fish using streamers this way than with dries or designated emerger patterns. Brookies are typically more susceptible than browns or rainbows…..don’t really know about cutthroat. Wolfgang
well it’s officially in my "go to" list of techniques. In my case last week, it did work on small browns…which are probably as aggressive as brookies in any event. I was swinging emergers successfully, and then saw a fish rising…switched to the EHC dry, missed a strike, then let it swing…it dove on the swing, and bang…fish on. Did that for another half an hour or so successfully until I moved on. — Rob
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Rob L writes: (snip) Normally I have had fish take the dries on the surface, not underneath. Any thoughts? This is a common occurence with land locked salmon. After the drag free drift, the fly is left to swing down and around, then stripped back slowly. They will hit it on the swing (it’s moving pretty quickly), or on the retrieve. While fishing on a river in Maine from a boat, my grandson caught fish after fish on a Goddard Caddis dragged in the current. Since I was netting his fish, I didn’t fish much. <G I have also seen brook trout take a fly like this. An emerger? Bait fish struggling?
The subsurface fly is a lot more visible to the trout than one floating on the surface. With a dry fly, the trout’s window of observation is very limited due to the reflective nature of the surface of the water (it works both sides of the water too, and just as we see sky and so on reflected off the surface, the trout & other fish see reflected riverbed at angles beyond the refraction / reflection limit). This aspect of visibility to the trout is one reason why I really like to use the nymph over the dry fly in a lot of places. A trout can be drawn to a nymph, however a dry fly must pass overhead of the trout in order to be seen. Parachute flies and Klinkhamers do manage to be seen better than most dryflies though, and that is because part of the fly has managed to penetrate the surface tension and become more visible to the trout. Regards, Mike.
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I don’t have a Google link–but here’s the pattern: Hook: Tiemco 100 or Daiichi 1100 or Mustad 94840 Size 12 to 22 Thread 8/0 Uni-thread color Red; Orange; Light Cahill; Gray Tail: Clump of snowshoe hare (from the heel of the foot) Body: Snowshoe hare dubbing (thread color shows through when wet–plan accordingly) Wing: Snowshoe Hare clump tied upright (Mayfly) or down-wing style (Caddis) Try this: http://www.flyanglersonline.com/flytying/intermediate/part28.html Seems pretty easy, even to me.
riverman
thanks to both for the pointer…definitely will try it. just tied up a couple of deep sparkle caddis pupa yesterday… now for "the usual"
Rob
Response:
I don’t have a Google link–but here’s the pattern: Hook: Tiemco 100 or Daiichi 1100 or Mustad 94840 Size 12 to 22 Thread 8/0 Uni-thread color Red; Orange; Light Cahill; Gray Tail: Clump of snowshoe hare (from the heel of the foot) Body: Snowshoe hare dubbing (thread color shows through when wet–plan accordingly) Wing: Snowshoe Hare clump tied upright (Mayfly) or down-wing style (Caddis)
Try this: http://www.flyanglersonline.com/flytying/intermediate/part28.html Seems pretty easy, even to me.
riverman
Response:
Any thoughts? Thanks Rob L Rob, as you’ve noticed, its a good technique. I use a fly called "the Usual" specifically for this. It is a great dry fly, but it becomes an instant emerger when allowed to swing in the current. The next cast, again dry then emerger. I can double my chances of catching fish in this way ’cause I’m fishing two parts of the water column vice one. Frank Reid
Frank, do you have a link to "the usual" tying pattern? I’m not savvy enough w/google to narrow down the search… I accidentally stumbled into the same technique with an EHC on the Delaware last week…worked great. — Rob S.
Response:
I accidentally stumbled into the same technique with an EHC on the Delaware last week…worked great.
I’ve used this method successfully with dozens of patterns while watching a partner fish. I typically just leave the bug in the water with a bunch of line out while watching. Virtually every pattern I’ve done this with has caught some fish. That said, some do work better than others…..or so it appears to me, anyway. The EHC has always been superb used in this way as well as in it’s more customary role as a dry fly. Pass lakes also work very well. Surprisingly, I’ve caught less fish using streamers this way than with dries or designated emerger patterns. Brookies are typically more susceptible than browns or rainbows…..don’t really know about cutthroat. Wolfgang
Response:
Virtually every pattern I’ve done this with has caught some fish. That said, some do work better than others…..or so it appears to me, anyway. The EHC has always been superb used in this way as well as in it’s more customary role as a dry fly. Pass lakes also work very well. Surprisingly, I’ve caught less fish using streamers this way than with dries or designated emerger patterns. Brookies are typically more susceptible than browns or rainbows…..
I’ll add a brown to the list, caught on a Royal Wulff, tho I confess it was more by accident than intent. Joe F.
Response:
Any thoughts? Thanks Rob L
Rob, as you’ve noticed, its a good technique. I use a fly called "the Usual" specifically for this. It is a great dry fly, but it becomes an instant emerger when allowed to swing in the current. The next cast, again dry then emerger. I can double my chances of catching fish in this way ’cause I’m fishing two parts of the water column vice one. Frank Reid
Response:
Hi Rob, Maybe they were taking it for an emerging insect? caddis? Could be very hungry fish or just lots of bugs moving at this time of year? Sometimes a twitched or skated dry will would well too. — Bill Kiene Kiene’s Fly Shop Sacramento, CA, USA www.kiene.com
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was on a river in Northern California that I had never fished before last weekend and was using dry flies the whole time. A weird thing (to me) was happening, I was catching quite a few fish after the fly completed its drift over where I suspected the fish were lying, and then I would let the fly hang in the current, sink under water slightly, hang there for a second again and then BAMN! Just like Emeril Lagasse the fish were slamming the dry fly. This occured on three different flies. Is this a common thing to happen? Normally I have had fish take the dries on the surface, not underneath. Any thoughts? Thanks Rob L
Response:
I was on a river in Northern California that I had never fished before last weekend and was using dry flies the whole time. A weird thing (to me) was happening, I was catching quite a few fish after the fly completed its drift over where I suspected the fish were lying, and then I would let the fly hang in the current, sink under water slightly, hang there for a second again and then BAMN! Just like Emeril Lagasse the fish were slamming the dry fly. This occured on three different flies. Is this a common thing to happen? Normally I have had fish take the dries on the surface, not underneath. Any thoughts? Thanks Rob L
Response:
Rob L writes:
(snip) Normally I have had fish take the dries on the surface, not underneath. Any thoughts?
This is a common occurence with land locked salmon. After the drag free drift, the fly is left to swing down and around, then stripped back slowly. They will hit it on the swing (it’s moving pretty quickly), or on the retrieve. While fishing on a river in Maine from a boat, my grandson caught fish after fish on a Goddard Caddis dragged in the current. Since I was netting his fish, I didn’t fish much. <G I have also seen brook trout take a fly like this. An emerger? Bait fish struggling? Dave
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was on a river in Northern California that I had never fished before last weekend and was using dry flies the whole time. A weird thing (to me) was happening, I was catching quite a few fish after the fly completed its drift over where I suspected the fish were lying, and then I would let the fly hang in the current, sink under water slightly, hang there for a second again and then BAMN! Just like Emeril Lagasse the fish were slamming the dry fly. This occured on three different flies. Is this a common thing to happen? Normally I have had fish take the dries on the surface, not underneath. Any thoughts? Thanks Rob L
Casting across, mending the line as it swings and letting it hang for awhile is classic wet fly technique which you have just rediscovered. Mike — Michael McGuire Hewlett Packard Laboratories Phone: (650)-857-5491 Palo Alto, CA 94303-0971
Response:
I was on a river in Northern California that I had never fished before last weekend and was using dry flies the whole time. A weird thing (to me) was happening, I was catching quite a few fish after the fly completed its drift over where I suspected the fish were lying, and then I would let the fly hang in the current, sink under water slightly, hang there for a second again and then BAMN! Just like Emeril Lagasse the fish were slamming the dry fly. This occured on three different flies. Is this a common thing to happen? Normally I have had fish take the dries on the surface, not underneath. Any thoughts? Thanks Rob L
Your dragging dry had become an emerger struggling to get to the surface (i.e. trout snack food.) Peter Visit The Streamer Page at http://home.cogeco.ca/~pcharles/streamers/index.html
