Question:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No, I just can’t stand the thought that someone actuallythinks that Tim’s the "gentleman" in this group. To say that all the swearing and cursing and foul words in this newsgroup is bad and then to hold up Tim as an example of a person who doesn’t do these thing….ARGH!!! Somebody’s been doin’ too much drugs. :-) Hi Ken, You’ve got it all wrong! I called Tim a gentleman in another thread, although it was to do with the same subject. I never said he was *the* gentleman in the NG, but *a* gentleman for forgiving Max for what everyone else would have seen him hung drawn and quartered. Tim has given out a lot of flack and certainly has taken some, not the least from you and J.P. He’s no angel but he is a GENTLEMAN for turning a blind eye to all Max has done.
I agree, but I wasn’t talking about you. :-) I went back and found out who it was, it was "Mr G", Here’s the excerpt: "The gentleman turns around slowly with raised gray brows and smiles a strange sort of smile and says . . . "Get lost, punk." As the king said to Mozart, "You argue Mozart, but you fail to persuade." Swearing is a lot like that, whereas, your arguments persuade because your logic and research is based on reason. When the man turned and said, "Get lost, punk" (a form of swearing that will affect that child for the rest of his life regarding fly fishing, possibly) instead of, "Why hello, young man. How are you today? You ever fly fish?" is what the flow of your persona as a gentleman/fly fisherman wins the moment of your thread and all those who swore and cursed and spit foul words before you, today, lost. " Now, do you believe that "the flow of [Tim's] persona" wins any moment of any thread? He’s usually the first one in there swearing and cursing and spitting foul words. Written with no malice aforethought (a novelty for this NG)
None taken nor given. Later, - Ken — Not speaking for anyone but myself
Response:
I Are you saying that Tim doesn’t swear and curse and spit foul words? What newsgroup have you been reading? This whole episode started because Tim had to resort to swearing. – Ken — Not speaking for anyone but myself No, I just can’t stand the thought that someone actuallythinks that Tim’s the "gentleman" in this group. To say that all the swearing and cursing and foul words in this newsgroup is bad and then to hold up Tim as an example of a person who doesn’t do these thing….ARGH!!! Somebody’s been doin’ too much drugs. :-)
Blah Blah Blah, ENOUGH. Prove that you know how to read by going back and re-examining Mr G’s (aka the Professional Sportsman) post. THEN take enough time to let it sink in that your first interpretation of his post is about 180 degrees out and that you’ve been arguing against someone who clearly agrees with you. Pentium inside eh? -tgades — Tony Gades. Seattle, WA. USA http://weber.u.washington.edu/~tgades http://weber.u.washington.edu/~tgades/Fishing/fish_page.html NOTICE: DO NOT ADD MY NAME TO _ANY_ MAILING LISTS.
Response:
I Are you saying that Tim doesn’t swear and curse and spit foul words? Blah Blah Blah, ENOUGH. Prove that you know how to read by going back and re-examining Mr G’s (aka the Professional Sportsman) post. THEN take enough time to let it sink in that your first interpretation of his post is about 180 degrees out and that you’ve been arguing against someone who clearly agrees with you.
If so, I’m wrong. Please read what I first wrote (what I’ve left unsnipped above). I asked him for clarification about what he wrote. Note the question marks…I’ll stop now so that I don’t turn and begin to spit foul words. :-) GRRR, - Ken — Not speaking for anyone but myself
Response:
: No, I just can’t stand the thought that someone actuallythinks that Tim’s the : "gentleman" in this group. To say that all : the swearing and cursing and foul words in this newsgroup is : bad and then to hold up Tim as an example of a person who : doesn’t do these thing….ARGH!!! Somebody’s been doin’ too : much drugs. :-) Sheesh Ken, read the post again. By overlooking the actual message Gherke’s post, you are propogating an attitude. He did not say what you claim he said. — Rick T. Rick Fletcher – http://www.chem.uidaho.edu/~fletcher/ Associate professor of chemistry | That’s Idaho, not Iowa. | ad hominem University of Idaho | Upper Left Hand Corner. | ad hominem Moscow, ID 83844-2343 | No, I don’t grow potatoes. | ad hominem
Response:
: No, I just can’t stand the thought that someone actuallythinks that Tim’s the : "gentleman" in this group. To say that all : the swearing and cursing and foul words in this newsgroup is : bad and then to hold up Tim as an example of a person who : doesn’t do these thing….ARGH!!! Somebody’s been doin’ too : much drugs. :-) Sheesh Ken, read the post again. By overlooking the actual message Gherke’s post, you are propogating an attitude. He did not say what you claim he said.
I stand corrected. I DID ask for a clarification, but then the thread wandered and I forgot the starting point. There are just too many posts to try to keep up on all of them. Later, - Ken — Not speaking for anyone but myself
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – My displeasure regards the pure, foul mouthing being allowed to permeate into this group. It just isn’t right. I can imagine (bear with me) of your story about the fellow that taught you a lot astream recently Tim. Let us all try and imagine therefore; the following. There is this sage looking gentleman with a pipe, tying on another fly as this kid watch in great admiration his skill in catching trout with such a long, graceful looking wand. So the child walks up to the man and from behind him as his back is turned to the bank, he says, "Hey Mr.? Whatcha doing?" The gentleman turns around slowly with raised gray brows and smiles a strange sort of smile and says . . . "Get lost, punk." As the king said to Mozart, "You argue Mozart, but you fail to persuade." Swearing is a lot like that, whereas, your arguments persuade because your logic and research is based on reason. When the man turned and said, "Get lost, punk" (a form of swearing that will affect that child for the rest of his life regarding fly fishing, possibly) instead of, "Why hello, young man. How are you today? You ever fly fish?" is what the flow of your persona as a gentleman/fly fisherman wins the moment of your thread and all those who swore and cursed and spit foul words before you, today, lost.
Are you saying that Tim doesn’t swear and curse and spit foul words? What newsgroup have you been reading? This whole episode started because Tim had to resort to swearing. - Ken — Not speaking for anyone but myself
Response:
There are just too many posts to try to keep up on all of them. - Ken
How about adopting the sensible policy of only replying to the threads that you _do_ "keep up on". Failing that, how about warning readers when you are replying to an article you have not read or thought about… cheers, -tony — Tony Gades. Seattle, WA. USA http://weber.u.washington.edu/~tgades http://weber.u.washington.edu/~tgades/Fishing/fish_page.html NOTICE: DO NOT ADD MY NAME TO _ANY_ MAILING LISTS.
Response:
Tim I don’t see how it is possible to "moderate" the group except by general consensus, ie. if someone oversteps the mark then the group excludes them to the extent that they give up and go elsewhere. If someone feels strongly enough to post a "fuck off" then OK, as long as it isn’t gratuitous. If you are insistent on creating a FAQ, (I don’t really consider it necessary, personally), then keep it to "frequently asked questions", why try and have rules that are unenforceable? General consensus will suffice. Personally, I still have reservations about Mr. Winters’ continued involvement with the group, time will tell if I am on my own on this one but, in my opinion, some valuable members have left as a result of his continued presence and this irks me. Maybe a few less Brits would suit some members of the group? Your apparent new found "sycophancy" worries me almost as much as the original "misdemeanours"! — Regards Peter (Please also reply by email, my server "loses" posts. Remove nospam to email) – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Let’s assume this FAQ TOC for starters… Fundamental Question before we start, I hope everyone checks in with an opinion on this fundamental tenet. Will the FAQ be building a different ROFF, i.e. "The Gentlemen’s Flyfishing Club"… (eg. "Fuck Off" – Excluded) or Will the FAQ acknowledge ROFF for what it is and provide complete protection for freedom of speech and expression thereof as far as it pertains to flyfishing ? (eg. "Fuck Off" – Protected) — To Max. I hope that you’re still there. Further I hope you will follow up to this question and help us sort out what ROFF is so that what has happened to us will not happen to others. The way I am viewing all of this [on this glorious Colorado morning] is that since we have no rules (written or otherwise) governing this newsgroup, than nobody could have possibily violated anything. — TimW – Halfordian Golfer Guilt replaced the creel…
Response:
Let’s assume this FAQ TOC for starters… Fundamental Question before we start, I hope everyone checks in with an opinion on this fundamental tenet. Will the FAQ be building a different ROFF, i.e. "The Gentlemen’s Flyfishing Club"… (eg. "Fuck Off" – Excluded)
Even more fundamental question, who decides what is "un-gentlemenly"? There are many ways to be vulgar and offensive without swearing. Is it okay to say: "F*ck off" "BS" "Bite me" "Bite my rod" I have not used an "offensive" word in the list above, the meaning is still there. If we say that none of these is acceptable, who is going to enforce it. You say you will leave if this group becomes moderated, but short of moderation this decision is unenforceable. Let me try to put this in terms you will understand since I hear that you are a programmer. You have coding style requirements. With the requirements alone, nothing changes, with moderate enforcement you get some change, but mostly only after the enforcement has happened upon your unfortunate soul, or you have heavy enforcement where if you don’t code properly your code doesn’t compile and won’t work until you fix the error. If you want "posting" standards the same will occur. Write down a list of rules and don’t enforce and it means nothing. Enforce heavily and it will work, but you will have a moderator sitting there saying yah or nay to every post. Is this what you want? I’m not in favor of moderation, but this is an academic exercise if you think writing down rules will change anything. or Will the FAQ acknowledge ROFF for what it is and provide complete protection for freedom of speech and expression thereof as far as it pertains to flyfishing ? (eg. "Fuck Off" – Protected)
This is status quo. I think the only way to "change" things is through individual policing. Think about how you personally are responding and whether or not you want to be seen the way your post makes you look. There will always be abusive people on usenet, it’s your decision about how to respond to them. For example, if someone, oh let’s see, calls someone a "fucking moron" you can respond in kind and get in a name-calling contest or ignore the post, or just snip out the line and continue with a semi-constructive argument. It may not change the abusive poster, but at least things won’t turn into a complete brawl and you won’t be acting like a 2nd grader. I don’t know if this helped or not, but at least it made me feel slightly better (CRAPPY weekend). Later, - Ken — Not speaking for anyone but myself
Response:
Umm…. ..are we gonna forget the charter and FAQ whilst everyone keeps pissing and moaning about Mr. G and what Tim REALLY meant and the rest of this Blah, Blah? I thought the "group" was serious about trying to get on track? Why don’t the limited number of you that want to continue griping about all the side issues find a chatroom to meet in and hammer this out between yourselves???
Response:
Let’s assume this FAQ TOC for starters… Fundamental Question before we start, I hope everyone checks in with an opinion on this fundamental tenet. Will the FAQ be building a different ROFF, i.e. "The Gentlemen’s Flyfishing Club"… (eg. "Fuck Off" – Excluded) or Will the FAQ acknowledge ROFF for what it is and provide complete protection for freedom of speech and expression thereof as far as it pertains to flyfishing ? (eg. "Fuck Off" – Protected) — To Max. I hope that you’re still there. Further I hope you will follow up to this question and help us sort out what ROFF is so that what has happened to us will not happen to others. The way I am viewing all of this [on this glorious Colorado morning] is that since we have no rules (written or otherwise) governing this newsgroup, than nobody could have possibily violated anything. — TimW – Halfordian Golfer Guilt replaced the creel… ROFF Charter Purpose of NG Goals of NG Rules for posting to NG Profanity Selling Attachments When to respond to Writer rather than Group FAQ’s Equipment Rods and Reels Float Devices Nets Vests Lines Leaders Accessories Clothing Rain Gear Hats Waders/Boots Guides Tipping Personal Experience Stories Tying (see ROFFT) PERSONAL BIOs Regular Frequent Posters Known Commercial Posters Known Frequently Medicated Posters
Response:
<nice post "Any fish bite if you got good bait… I’m a going fishin’ too".<g — Charlie…
Response:
Nice to see you back. I still do not agree with most of what you say though. Chris Brown – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –
Response:
<MERCILESS CHOP The GOAL of this rather longish post is to help to get ROFF back on track <MERCILESS CHOP Hey, isn’t that what the investigator joker said too? Anyway, I can’t imagine what the hell this "back on track" acually means. It always was a bunch of us jackass fishers talking amongst ourselves about whaterver we please and it always will be. My observations of these groups (since their conception) is that for every person who takes them (too) seriously, there are a thousand (and climbing daily) who don’t. If anyone wants to get with a group of folks that are all as serious as they are should get into a listserv – I’ll be happy to explain via email what this means. FAQ’s for these groups are a great concept, but a waste of time. 99.44% of the time the only people aware of the FAQ are people who don’t need it – and FAQ’s certainly don’t squelch the repetitive discussions. cheers, -tgades — Tony Gades. Seattle, WA. USA http://weber.u.washington.edu/~tgades http://weber.u.washington.edu/~tgades/Fishing/fish_page.html NOTICE: DO NOT ADD MY NAME TO _ANY_ MAILING LISTS.
Response:
Q: What’s the difference between Tim Walker’s head and a buttplug? A: The buttplug comes out once in a while. Sorry, just had to complete the symmetry. I’ll help out on the FAQ, but someone, really anyone, has to set out a real and complete first draft of a Table of Contents. It won’t be the final one and it won’t be right, but it will give a starting point. I could suggest a list of 10 or so names for this job, but you guys probably know who you are. Any volunteers? We can’t really start without it. — Rick T. Rick Fletcher – http://www.chem.uidaho.edu/~fletcher/ Associate professor of chemistry | That’s Idaho, not Iowa. | ad hominem University of Idaho | Upper Left Hand Corner. | ad hominem Moscow, ID 83844-2343 | No, I don’t grow potatoes. | ad hominem
Response:
What is it about flyfishing that creates such unbridled passion ? About this damned newsgroup ?
No offense, and with all due respect, it’s you. Swearing at people who don’t agree with you, calling people names when they don’t agree with you, doing whatever pleases you to someone who doesn’t agree with you is what makes this newsgroup so violent. If you REALLY are trying to turn over a new leaf then I’m willing to let bygones be bygones, but if you think that simply making a FAQ is going to change anything by itself you are far too optimistic. So, Jimbo – Whomever had May 22 on the Skeeter returns pool, gets the warm Molson.
Hey, give credit where credit is due, it was my pool. :-) Although NOBODY was guessing this soon, you usually wait at least a couple of weeks. The GOAL of this rather longish post is to help to get ROFF back on track and with high hopes of a much better ROFF for all of us in the very near future.
<honest question Maybe you can define what a "better" ROFF looks like. – No political rants? – No ethical rants? – No swearing? – No name-calling? Unless you do some or all of those, what will change? </honest question Clean slate ? Any AYE’S ?
Sure, I’ll be happy to start over, again it’s mostly up to you though. Your first swearing rant over someone C&R-ing a fish and we’ll be right back where we started. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – RFD: A NEW FAQ For Rec.Outdoors.Fishing.Fly "FAQ – Rec.Outdoors.Fishing.Fly" What the FAQ ? <g (i.e. Why…? Anecdotal, but real…) Hierarchy Etiquette ? (Recommend None. <G) Rules governing SPAM Common Questions (Equipment, Setup, Places to go) Endless Threads 1. C&R Basic Position – [Ralph or delegates Can write ?] 2. C&K Basic position – [Jon Cook or ??? can write ?] Frequent Posters Personal BIO’S Moe Skeeter – Pigheaded Buttmunch C&K homebrewer….(We’d write our own) Fishing Links etc. Do you see where this could go ? Do you see how this could be useful and prevent any hard feelings in the future ? How a newbie can get answered immediately ? Links and info and organization..
The general info part of a FAQ is certainly a good idea. I question the ability of a FAQ to regulate etiquette or to make a difference in the "endless threads". The problem is that veterans already know the info and those who need the info rarely read FAQs. I would be willing to help with a general info section, but the other sections are basically futile in the chaotic USENet. Tell you what, if you can get an agreement on what a "better" ROFF looks like I’ll reconsider. I think you are underestimating the variety of viewpoints people have here. Good Luck, - Ken — Not speaking for anyone but myself
Response:
_____ Well Tim, I know nothing about this person Max that is supposed to be a rascal, but your arguments are of a reasonable man. Of course, personally, I like most of the men in this group. The only reason why there aren’t more ladies involved here is because . . . and then it ceases to be interesting regarding "attention spans and talking fishing?" Not important issue right now. But I accept your reasoning. My displeasure regards the pure, foul mouthing being allowed to permeate into this group. It just isn’t right. I can imagine (bear with me) of your story about the fellow that taught you a lot astream recently Tim. Let us all try and imagine therefore; the following. There is this sage looking gentleman with a pipe, tying on another fly as this kid watch in great admiration his skill in catching trout with such a long, graceful looking wand. So the child walks up to the man and from behind him as his back is turned to the bank, he says, "Hey Mr.? Whatcha doing?" The gentleman turns around slowly with raised gray brows and smiles a strange sort of smile and says . . . "Get lost, punk." As the king said to Mozart, "You argue Mozart, but you fail to persuade." Swearing is a lot like that, whereas, your arguments persuade because your logic and research is based on reason. When the man turned and said, "Get lost, punk" (a form of swearing that will affect that child for the rest of his life regarding fly fishing, possibly) instead of, "Why hello, young man. How are you today? You ever fly fish?" is what the flow of your persona as a gentleman/fly fisherman wins the moment of your thread and all those who swore and cursed and spit foul words before you, today, lost.
Response:
<lot of good stuff snipped – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -I hope everyone has a wonderful Memorial day weekend. I have a couple people in mind that I’ll need to remember hard this year…. You get a line…I’ll get a pole…Honey. You get a line…I’ll get a pole….bay-beee… You get a line…I’ll get a pole, We’ll go down to the crawdad hole. Honey, Bay- be mine…. Your pal, — TimW
tim…you ‘da man…. ;^) btw…"SECRET" flies in the mail come tuesday, just finished tying another batch of ‘em. -walt
Response:
tim…you ‘da man…. ;^)
Yeah! — Bill
Response:
ROFF Charter Purpose of NG Goals of NG Rules for posting to NG Profanity Selling Attachments When to respond to Writer rather than Group FAQ’s Equipment Rods and Reels Float Devices Nets
Vests Lines Leaders Accessories Clothing Rain Gear Hats Waders/Boots Guides Tipping Personal Experience Stories Tying (see ROFFT) PERSONAL BIOs Regular Frequent Posters Known Commercial Posters Known Frequently Medicated Posters
Response:
Good start! I’ve added a suggestion or two below.
: ROFF Charter : Purpose of NG : Goals of NG : Rules for posting to NG : Profanity : Selling : Attachments : When to respond to Writer rather than Group : FAQ’s : Equipment : Rods and Reels : Float Devices : Nets
: Vests : Lines : Leaders : Accessories : Clothing : Rain Gear : Hats : Waders/Boots : Guides : Tipping : Personal Experience Stories : Tying (see ROFFT) General Why are they picking on Orvis? What do they have against Jeep Grand Cherokees? Who is Brian Keith? : PERSONAL BIOs : Regular Frequent Posters : Known Commercial Posters : Known Frequently Medicated Posters : — Rick T. Rick Fletcher – http://www.chem.uidaho.edu/~fletcher/ Associate professor of chemistry | That’s Idaho, not Iowa. | ad hominem University of Idaho | Upper Left Hand Corner. | ad hominem Moscow, ID 83844-2343 | No, I don’t grow potatoes. | ad hominem
Response:
I Are you saying that Tim doesn’t swear and curse and spit foul words? What newsgroup have you been reading? This whole episode started because Tim had to resort to swearing. – Ken — Not speaking for anyone but myself
Ken, It seems to me that you are deliberately continuing to try and fuel this smoldering fire. Lighten up…..
–Walt
Response:
I Are you saying that Tim doesn’t swear and curse and spit foul words? What newsgroup have you been reading? This whole episode started because Tim had to resort to swearing. – Ken — Not speaking for anyone but myself Ken, It seems to me that you are deliberately continuing to try and fuel this smoldering fire.
No, I just can’t stand the thought that someone actuallythinks that Tim’s the "gentleman" in this group. To say that all the swearing and cursing and foul words in this newsgroup is bad and then to hold up Tim as an example of a person who doesn’t do these thing….ARGH!!! Somebody’s been doin’ too much drugs. :-) Lighten up…..
Nah, I’m always too light, maybe if I called someone an imbecilic dweeb I could get in on the really good fights. :-) Later, - Ken P.S. No hard feelings, I noted the smiley and please note mine in return. — Not speaking for anyone but myself
Response:
No, I just can’t stand the thought that someone actuallythinks that Tim’s the "gentleman" in this group. To say that all the swearing and cursing and foul words in this newsgroup is bad and then to hold up Tim as an example of a person who doesn’t do these thing….ARGH!!! Somebody’s been doin’ too much drugs. :-)
Hi Ken, You’ve got it all wrong! I called Tim a gentleman in another thread, although it was to do with the same subject. I never said he was *the* gentleman in the NG, but *a* gentleman for forgiving Max for what everyone else would have seen him hung drawn and quartered. Tim has given out a lot of flack and certainly has taken some, not the least from you and J.P. He’s no angel but he is a GENTLEMAN for turning a blind eye to all Max has done. I’ve no doubt some of Tim’s comments in the future will be succinct, curt, bombastic, witty, even vitriolic, but always well founded on solid principle. Can you match up to such a guy in eloquence and character? Written with no malice aforethought (a novelty for this NG) Regards, — Bill
Response:
I am disturbed by these recent events. Restless. Sleepless. Bothered. What is it about flyfishing that creates such unbridled passion ? About this damned newsgroup ? IMHO – Max Whittington is, I am certain (now more than ever) a good man who made an honest mistake. Lord knows, I have. Moreover he made a mistake about something he is passionate about. Lord knows, I have done that too. Have you ? I have read carefully every post has made here and I see something different than what has been revealed by these events. First off he is helpful to the beginner. Cordial and a gentleman. Sincere. He is also a hell of an investigator <g, this might be useful when the REAL loons come around <g. We can not all get mad and quit when something bad happens and I am not setting any example. I am very sorry for that. If we all acted like this…then there were none. —- Like the constant upstream migration of an emerging insect, with all of the odds against it, we *must* press upstream and solve this problem…. —- So, Jimbo – Whomever had May 22 on the Skeeter returns pool, gets the warm Molson. I can not leave the group like this. It sucks. It’s mean spirited and hurting. And it is only Qayaniskatsi – Life out of balance. I do not sense mean hearts among us, anywhere, do you ? —- I have 2 serious issues. Please bear with me The GOAL of this rather longish post is to help to get ROFF back on track and with high hopes of a much better ROFF for all of us in the very near future. —- First off…everyone…please go to www.dejanews.com and read the stuff Max posts. He’s a good Joe, IMO (not that MY opinion is worth a ratty waterlogged adams). It is true that I felt violated by the background check and the email to my employer, but he woke my eyes up in a huge way. It may NOT be safe to have an unchecked opinion in cyberspace. You too might want to consider this. I am hoping to find out just what in the world is out there easily for people to find and I intend to ask Max to help me. Friends… You take the bad with the good, but you look for the good… …and I see a hell of a lot of it in that man. I challenge you to read *all* of his posts and not agree. I know (feel) that something positive is coming out of this and in the end I predict that not only will Max be a good friend to a lot of us, but that ROFF will be better, stronger and more organized place to deal with the hectic, eclectic and sometimes strange internet demands placed upon it. — Let’s use this as an opportunity to grow. Individually, collectively… — That was my first serious issue and I am serious. Can we forgive and forget by remembering [who we are]…Royal Order of the Brothers of the Bugchuckers… Number two will just be ‘#2′ <g if we can not. Clean slate ? Any AYE’S ? Part 2. RFD: A NEW FAQ For Rec.Outdoors.Fishing.Fly Request for Discussion… We need a new FAQ for ROFF. It is high time. I believe that none of this would have happened if we had one and will take at some of the heat if for this alone. I’ve been around long enough that it’s at least partly my laziness that we don’t have the damned thing done yet ! John Ferriera, where are you ? Consider this…. The C&R thread has been active for at least 7-8 years ? It has started/ended/mutated so many times that it’s *amazing*. This can *only* speak to its relevence of it as a valid subject in our sport, or at least to a buncha people here as it relates to our sport (I am in this group that feels that it needs discussing). That, however, is *not* the point (only an example)…please view it only as such. The point is, is that it is maddening to have to justify its (the threads) existence over and over and over, like some of us have had to. Why should I feel guilty discussing C&R ad infinitum around here ? (or cussing or swearing…). We have been around and around on this and I have a solid proposal. To use Max’s example: Assume that this is a club, only its like no other club in the world. We have no limitations on membership. No education requirements or dress code. We have no choice in the matter, really, unless we moderate the group, because this group exists in the Universe of the internet we must treat it as a subset of this Universe. If the group becomes moderated, well…that’s fine…but then please point me to the unmoderated one. The FAQ *WILL* give credence to and justify these ongoing threads so that they will not be the targets of trivialization or condemnation. Moreover the FAQ will set the rules of fair play in ROFF that we will all have to agree to, or move on. Certain things will be covered in the FAQ, such as "Opinions on Floatants". Hopefully, this will grow with relevent information and all of the info, such as Albolene, secret formulas and the history of George Gehrke and his product on can get thoroughly and objectively covered there once. Instead of saying "This group sucks…can we change it ?", We could say…"Uh…this part of the FAQ sucks, can we change it …?". Thus I propose a *MEMBER DETERMINED* FAQ having a "table of contents" something like: "FAQ – Rec.Outdoors.Fishing.Fly" What the FAQ ? <g (i.e. Why…? Anecdotal, but real…) Hierarchy Etiquette ? (Recommend None. <G) Rules governing SPAM Common Questions (Equipment, Setup, Places to go) Endless Threads 1. C&R Basic Position – [Ralph or delegates Can write ?] 2. C&K Basic position – [Jon Cook or ??? can write ?] Frequent Posters Personal BIO’S Moe Skeeter – Pigheaded Buttmunch C&K homebrewer….(We’d write our own) Fishing Links etc. Do you see where this could go ? Do you see how this could be useful and prevent any hard feelings in the future ? How a newbie can get answered immediately ? Links and info and organization.. IOW – Shouldn’t we get our collective shit together a little ? Vroman hates me for a very similar misunderstanding…we simply don’t agree on what ROFF is, but how can either of us be right if NOBODY knows what ROFF is ? By end of summer…let’s say…we all agree on what ROFF is…DEAL ? It’s something to consider…. Max, I hope you’re still with us ? Comments ? Peace. No hard feelings…. I hope everyone has a wonderful Memorial day weekend. I have a couple people in mind that I’ll need to remember hard this year…. You get a line…I’ll get a pole…Honey. You get a line…I’ll get a pole….bay-beee… You get a line…I’ll get a pole, We’ll go down to the crawdad hole. Honey, Bay- be mine…. Your pal, — TimW What is ROFF ?
Response: