<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fly Fishing Fisherman Wiki &#187; Fly Fishing Line</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flyfishingfisherman.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cutups and Cutthroats</title>
		<link>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/cutups-and-cutthroats-2393908.html</link>
		<comments>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/cutups-and-cutthroats-2393908.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fly Fishing Line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flyfishingfisherman.com/uncategorized/cutups-and-cutthroats-2393908.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
&#34;ci+&#34; &#60;c&#8230;@ciNukeSpam.com&#62; wrote in news:Xns95583DE20A3D7ci@65.245.115.2:  &#62; not mentioning that some of hose were Carter &#8216;babies&#8217;. also ignoring  &#62; reasons why a repug or demcon might have rejected those weapons&#44; such as  &#62; obsolescence &#160; 
Hey&#44; the B1 was great in Afghanistan&#44; we can pound the hell out people&#8211;as  long as they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>&quot;ci+&quot; &lt;c&#8230;@ciNukeSpam.com&gt; wrote in news:Xns95583DE20A3D7ci@65.245.115.2:  &gt; not mentioning that some of hose were Carter &#8216;babies&#8217;. also ignoring  &gt; reasons why a repug or demcon might have rejected those weapons&#44; such as  &gt; obsolescence &nbsp; </p>
<p>Hey&#44; the B1 was great in Afghanistan&#44; we can pound the hell out people&#8211;as  long as they have no fighter or missle defenses! </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>&quot;Eerie Cabinets of Dr. Rodent&quot; &lt;a&#8230;@at.org&gt; in  news:Xns955840562E99Ffkjdlkvjcxoiuarepoij@68.6.19.6:  &gt;&quot;ci+&quot; &lt;c&#8230;@ciNukeSpam.com&gt; wrote in  &gt;news:Xns95583DE20A3D7ci@65.245.115.2:  &gt;&gt; not mentioning that some of hose were Carter &#8216;babies&#8217;. also ignoring  &gt;&gt; reasons why a repug or demcon might have rejected those weapons&#44; such  &gt;&gt; as obsolescence &nbsp;  &gt; Hey&#44; the B1 was great in Afghanistan&#44; we can pound the hell out  &gt; people&#8211;as long as they have no fighter or missle defenses! </p>
<p>it must be cheaper to operate than a &nbsp;b2. maybe the costs have been  amortized or whatever. maybe it carries more tonnage than a b2?  &#8212;  If Tolkien didn&#8217;t want us to eat Hobbits&#44; why did he make them of meat? </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>&quot;ci+&quot; &lt;c&#8230;@ciNukeSpam.com&gt; wrote in news:Xns95587B395BB97ci@65.245.115.2:  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -&gt; &quot;Eerie Cabinets of Dr. Rodent&quot; &lt;a&#8230;@at.org&gt; in  &gt; news:Xns955840562E99Ffkjdlkvjcxoiuarepoij@68.6.19.6:  &gt;&gt;&quot;ci+&quot; &lt;c&#8230;@ciNukeSpam.com&gt; wrote in  &gt;&gt;news:Xns95583DE20A3D7ci@65.245.115.2:  &gt;&gt;&gt; not mentioning that some of hose were Carter &#8216;babies&#8217;. also ignoring  &gt;&gt;&gt; reasons why a repug or demcon might have rejected those weapons&#44; such  &gt;&gt;&gt; as obsolescence &nbsp;  &gt;&gt; Hey&#44; the B1 was great in Afghanistan&#44; we can pound the hell out  &gt;&gt; people&#8211;as long as they have no fighter or missle defenses!  &gt; it must be cheaper to operate than a &nbsp;b2. maybe the costs have been  &gt; amortized or whatever. maybe it carries more tonnage than a b2? </p>
<p>It was made in California&#8230;which has a large number of representatives in  Congress. &nbsp;Other than that I can&#8217;t think of a reason why the USAF wanted a  high-altitude bomber. &nbsp;Vested interests &amp; entrenched beauracrats would be  my guess.  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>&quot;Eerie Cabinets of Dr. Rodent&quot; &lt;a&#8230;@at.org&gt; wrote in message &lt;news:Xns95582DA24AE22fkjdlkvjcxoiuarepoij@68.6.19.6&gt;&#8230;  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -&gt; Cutups and Cutthroats  &gt; By MAUREEN DOWD  &gt; Published: September 2&#44; 2004  &gt; I always enjoy hearing about how a teenage Dick Cheney stood off to the  &gt; side with buckets of water to put out Lynne&#8217;s flaming batons.  &gt; But there was an even better moment during Claire Shipman&#8217;s two-part &quot;Good  &gt; Morning America&quot; interview at the Wyoming ranch this week. Trying to  &gt; humanize Dr. No&#44; ABC was let into the inner sanctum to watch Mr. Cheney  &gt; take his 4-year-old granddaughter on her first solo horsie ride and hear  &gt; how he&#8217;s teaching his granddaughters fly-fishing.  &gt; Advertisement  &gt; Ms. Shipman asked the vice president &quot;his greatest guilty pleasure.&quot;  &gt; His wife quickly interjected that it was fishing. But we all know&#44; of  &gt; course&#44; it&#8217;s global domination.  &gt; It&#8217;s always amusing to watch Republicans try to get down. At convention  &gt; time&#44; they stop bilking Joe Lunchbox to act like Joe Lunchbox. </p>
<p>how do you make hitler funny?  h </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>&quot;Eerie Cabinets of Dr. Rodent&quot; &lt;a&#8230;@at.org&gt; in  news:Xns95582DA24AE22fkjdlkvjcxoiuarepoij@68.6.19.6:  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -&gt; Cutups and Cutthroats  &gt; By MAUREEN DOWD  &gt; Published: September 2&#44; 2004  &gt; I always enjoy hearing about how a teenage Dick Cheney stood off to  &gt; the side with buckets of water to put out Lynne&#8217;s flaming batons.  &gt; But there was an even better moment during Claire Shipman&#8217;s two-part  &gt; &quot;Good Morning America&quot; interview at the Wyoming ranch this week.  &gt; Trying to humanize Dr. No&#44; ABC was let into the inner sanctum to watch  &gt; Mr. Cheney take his 4-year-old granddaughter on her first solo horsie  &gt; ride and hear how he&#8217;s teaching his granddaughters fly-fishing.  &gt; Advertisement  &gt; Ms. Shipman asked the vice president &quot;his greatest guilty pleasure.&quot;  &gt; His wife quickly interjected that it was fishing. But we all know&#44; of  &gt; course&#44; it&#8217;s global domination.  &gt; It&#8217;s always amusing to watch Republicans try to get down. At  &gt; convention time&#44; they stop bilking Joe Lunchbox to act like Joe  &gt; Lunchbox.  &gt; How awkward in Columbus&#44; when W.&#44; hanging with Jack Nicklaus&#44; noted  &gt; that his grandfather was born there&#44; so they should &quot;send a homeboy  &gt; back to Washington&#44; D.C.&quot; Do they know a homeboy from a Lawn-Boy?  &gt; How you livin&#8217;&#44; dawg?  &gt; And speaking of dawgs&#44; whuddup with that video of Barney debating that  &gt; French poodle Fifi Kerry about taxes? By the time the twins finished  &gt; their White House Valley Girl routine&#44; and Karl Rove and Karen Hughes  &gt; went all giddy in the sendup&#44; the convention&#8217;s arc was clear.  &gt; Highly scripted screwball moments designed to soothe fears that the  &gt; Bushies are bullies alternate with high-octane&#44; turbo moments designed  &gt; to stir up fears that we won&#8217;t be safe without the Bush bullies.  &gt; Unlike the arrogant Boston Kerry strategists&#44; who focus-grouped and  &gt; dial-a- metered their convention to death&#44; scrubbing most of the  &gt; direct attacks on President Bush&#44; the arrogant Austin Bush strategists  &gt; have encouraged their non-girlie-men speakers to put the pedal to the  &gt; metal and flatten the poor Democrat who is windsurfing through his  &gt; free fall.  &gt; Despite the fact that the economy is cratering&#44; Iraq is teetering&#44; </p>
<p>those 2 seem exaggerated .  &gt; Afghanistan is reverting to warlords&#44; </p>
<p>is it? i think it&#8217;s had setbacks&#44; and their citizens suffer typical  human inflexibilty&#8230; guaranteeing slow social progress&#8230;.  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -&gt;Dick Cheney is glowering at the  &gt; world&#44; the war on terror has created more acts of terror&#44; Ahmad  &gt; Chalabi is an accused spy for Iran and the Pentagon has an accused spy  &gt; for Israel&#44; Republicans felt so good about themselves that when Arnold  &gt; Schwarzenegger said he was inspired to become a Republican by Richard  &gt; Nixon&#44; they exploded. When Tricky Dick is a hot applause line&#44; they&#8217;re  &gt; feeling cocky.  &gt; Republicans are political killers. They are confident that Americans&#44;  &gt; in a 9/11 world&#44; are going to be more drawn to political killers who  &gt; have made some &quot;miscalculations&quot; on Iraq&#44; as W. put it&#44; than with a  &gt; shaggy-haired Vietnam War protester whom Bush 41 compares to Hanoi  &gt; Jane.  &gt;&quot;I still have great difficulty with his coming back and making those  &gt; statements before the Congress and throwing medals away&#44;&quot; the  &gt; president&#8217;s father told Don Imus yesterday.  &gt; Republicans know that plunging ahead with a course of action&#44; even if  &gt; it becomes obvious it&#8217;s wrong&#44; is an easier political sell than  &gt; flip-flopping&#44; even if it&#8217;s right. </p>
<p>funny how foxnews dittohead hotheads don&#8217;t even realize that the repugs  are sinking in their own quicksand&#8230; all on their own. no one is really  opposing them.  &gt; When the president slipped&#44; admitting that the war on terror is  &gt; unwinnable &#8211; perhaps recognizing that terror&#8217;s a tactic&#44; not an enemy  &gt; &#8211; he had to be saved later by Laura Bush&#44; who fixed his stumble into  &gt; nuance. Then Mr. Kerry made the mistake of responding in Bush  &gt; black-and-white&#44; calling the war on terror winnable. </p>
<p>ha! kerry says almost nothing. bush out-bloopers kerry. which is worse?  &#8230; &gt;:  &gt; While Democrats whined about the meanies and their Swift boat attacks&#44;  &gt; the G.O.P. juggernaut rolled on.  &gt; Zell Miller&#44; playing Cotton Mather behind the cross-like lectern&#44; made  &gt; Mr. Cheney seem rational&#44; with a maniacal litany of weapons he said  &gt; Mr. Kerry had opposed that can destroy any mud hut in any third world  &gt; country: B-1 and B-2 bombers&#44; F-14A Tomcats&#44; F-15 Eagles&#44; Patriot and  &gt; Trident missiles&#44; and Aegis cruisers. </p>
<p>not mentioning that some of hose were Carter &#8216;babies&#8217;. also ignoring  reasons why a repug or demcon might have rejected those weapons&#44; such as  obsolescence &nbsp;  &gt; Just as the &quot;third party&quot; ad effort has been ferocious and misleading&#44;  &gt; so have some of the attack speeches here. Dick Cheney stomped on John  &gt; Kerry the way he&#8217;s stomped on the world. In fact&#44; he stomped on Mr.  &gt; Kerry for trying to get along with the world: &quot;He talks about leading  &gt; &#8216;a more sensitive war on terror&#8217; as though Al Qaeda will be impressed  &gt; with our softer side.&quot; It&#8217;s nice to know Mr. Cheney remembers Al  &gt; Qaeda. </p>
<p>&nbsp;&#8217;a more sensitive war on terror&#8217;  i&#8217;ve hearda bout this only via insulting reactoins. just now googled&#44;  http://www.nationalreview.com/goldberg/goldberg200408061120.asp  whihc is amazingly polite ciriticism&#44; rare among wrought-wingers. if  this column is accurate regarding kerry&#8217;s intended meaning behind his  phrase &#8216;more sensitive war on terror&#8217;&#44; then kerry&#8217;s missing out on what  his phrase *should* have meant. becoming frineds with citizens of  countries whrer terrorirsts &quot;breed&quot; is probably the most effective &quot;war &nbsp;  on terror&quot;&#8230;. &#8217;sensitive&#8217; or &#8216;nonsensitive&#8217;.  &gt; As others raged&#44; Mr. Bush flew to New York and went to an Italian  &gt; community center to eat pizza with Queens firemen. The homeboy was  &gt; having a ruthless&#44; but effective&#44; week. </p>
<p>did they have an orgies? why do repugs have all the fun! i must be too  sensitive.  http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;lr=&#038;ie=UTF-8  &amp;q=firemen+sex+Scandal++Fordham+%7C+Brooklyn%7C+york  &#8212;  A nude Gollum on your doorstep is  burn baby&#44; burn </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Cutups and Cutthroats  By MAUREEN DOWD  Published: September 2&#44; 2004  I always enjoy hearing about how a teenage Dick Cheney stood off to the  side with buckets of water to put out Lynne&#8217;s flaming batons.  But there was an even better moment during Claire Shipman&#8217;s two-part &quot;Good  Morning America&quot; interview at the Wyoming ranch this week. Trying to  humanize Dr. No&#44; ABC was let into the inner sanctum to watch Mr. Cheney  take his 4-year-old granddaughter on her first solo horsie ride and hear  how he&#8217;s teaching his granddaughters fly-fishing.  Advertisement  Ms. Shipman asked the vice president &quot;his greatest guilty pleasure.&quot;  His wife quickly interjected that it was fishing. But we all know&#44; of  course&#44; it&#8217;s global domination.  It&#8217;s always amusing to watch Republicans try to get down. At convention  time&#44; they stop bilking Joe Lunchbox to act like Joe Lunchbox.  How awkward in Columbus&#44; when W.&#44; hanging with Jack Nicklaus&#44; noted that  his grandfather was born there&#44; so they should &quot;send a homeboy back to  Washington&#44; D.C.&quot; Do they know a homeboy from a Lawn-Boy?  How you livin&#8217;&#44; dawg?  And speaking of dawgs&#44; whuddup with that video of Barney debating that  French poodle Fifi Kerry about taxes? By the time the twins finished their  White House Valley Girl routine&#44; and Karl Rove and Karen Hughes went all  giddy in the sendup&#44; the convention&#8217;s arc was clear.  Highly scripted screwball moments designed to soothe fears that the Bushies  are bullies alternate with high-octane&#44; turbo moments designed to stir up  fears that we won&#8217;t be safe without the Bush bullies.  Unlike the arrogant Boston Kerry strategists&#44; who focus-grouped and dial-a-  metered their convention to death&#44; scrubbing most of the direct attacks on  President Bush&#44; the arrogant Austin Bush strategists have encouraged their  non-girlie-men speakers to put the pedal to the metal and flatten the poor  Democrat who is windsurfing through his free fall.  Despite the fact that the economy is cratering&#44; Iraq is teetering&#44;  Afghanistan is reverting to warlords&#44; Dick Cheney is glowering at the  world&#44; the war on terror has created more acts of terror&#44; Ahmad Chalabi is  an accused spy for Iran and the Pentagon has an accused spy for Israel&#44;  Republicans felt so good about themselves that when Arnold Schwarzenegger  said he was inspired to become a Republican by Richard Nixon&#44; they  exploded. When Tricky Dick is a hot applause line&#44; they&#8217;re feeling cocky.  Republicans are political killers. They are confident that Americans&#44; in a  9/11 world&#44; are going to be more drawn to political killers who have made  some &quot;miscalculations&quot; on Iraq&#44; as W. put it&#44; than with a shaggy-haired  Vietnam War protester whom Bush 41 compares to Hanoi Jane.  &quot;I still have great difficulty with his coming back and making those  statements before the Congress and throwing medals away&#44;&quot; the president&#8217;s  father told Don Imus yesterday.  Republicans know that plunging ahead with a course of action&#44; even if it  becomes obvious it&#8217;s wrong&#44; is an easier political sell than flip-flopping&#44;  even if it&#8217;s right.  When the president slipped&#44; admitting that the war on terror is unwinnable  &#8211; perhaps recognizing that terror&#8217;s a tactic&#44; not an enemy &#8211; he had to be  saved later by Laura Bush&#44; who fixed his stumble into nuance. Then Mr.  Kerry made the mistake of responding in Bush black-and-white&#44; calling the  war on terror winnable.  While Democrats whined about the meanies and their Swift boat attacks&#44; the  G.O.P. juggernaut rolled on.  Zell Miller&#44; playing Cotton Mather behind the cross-like lectern&#44; made Mr.  Cheney seem rational&#44; with a maniacal litany of weapons he said Mr. Kerry  had opposed that can destroy any mud hut in any third world country: B-1  and B-2 bombers&#44; F-14A Tomcats&#44; F-15 Eagles&#44; Patriot and Trident missiles&#44;  and Aegis cruisers.  Just as the &quot;third party&quot; ad effort has been ferocious and misleading&#44; so  have some of the attack speeches here. Dick Cheney stomped on John Kerry  the way he&#8217;s stomped on the world. In fact&#44; he stomped on Mr. Kerry for  trying to get along with the world: &quot;He talks about leading &#8216;a more  sensitive war on terror&#8217; as though Al Qaeda will be impressed with our  softer side.&quot; It&#8217;s nice to know Mr. Cheney remembers Al Qaeda.  As others raged&#44; Mr. Bush flew to New York and went to an Italian community  center to eat pizza with Queens firemen. The homeboy was having a ruthless&#44;  but effective&#44; week. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/cutups-and-cutthroats-2393908.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loop Knots</title>
		<link>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/loop-knots-1609684.html</link>
		<comments>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/loop-knots-1609684.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fly Fishing Line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flyfishingfisherman.com/uncategorized/loop-knots-1609684.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
I was probably coming into the conversation late &#8211; what&#8217;s new?! I usually  use a duncan loop to tie tippet to fly. I usually start with a fairly loose  knot in the hope that the fly will move in a more natural manner (and that  that will make a difference)&#44; but it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>I was probably coming into the conversation late &#8211; what&#8217;s new?! I usually  use a duncan loop to tie tippet to fly. I usually start with a fairly loose  knot in the hope that the fly will move in a more natural manner (and that  that will make a difference)&#44; but it usually tightens up after a few casts.  If I can ever get to the point that I can tell that my choice of  fly-to-tippet connection makes a difference I&#8217;ll stop being a banker and  become a guide.  Bob </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; bob&#44; i think they&#8217;re talking about a loop&#44; instead of clinch&#44; uni&#44; or   other knot&#44; connection of tippet to fly. &nbsp;anyway&#44; on that assumption&#44;   several experienced and knowledgeable folks in the nc mountains suggest   the loop allows wets&#44; nymphs&#44; and streamers to move about in the water   better and allow more realistic presentation. &nbsp;i use the surgeon&#8217;s loop   at times. &nbsp;i haven&#8217;t been able to tell if there&#8217;s much difference in the   fish&#8217;s appreciation of my effort though&#8230;   jeff    //snip//    Bill&#44; do you have any sense of whether a loop makes a    difference ? &nbsp;I&#8217;ve gone back and forth with loop vs    non-loop connections to clousers (read: am I too tired/    cold/etc to bother) and haven&#8217;t noticed a difference.    I&#8217;m going through the same debate. Nail knots are a pain in the ass to  tie.    I&#8217;ve been upset enough with loop connectors (they get jammed in the  guides)    that I swear never to use them again&#44; but then when it&#8217;s cold and I want  to    get a new leader on quickly I capitulate. Have never tried leader links&#44;  but    Wolfgang was using one on our Hazel trip and it seemed to be a good  compact    connection.    &#8212;    http://rwpatton.home.netcom.com/  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  &nbsp;Try the &quot;non-slip loop&quot;&#44; which is the Rapala loop without the final   &nbsp;step. &nbsp;Both are supposed to be stronger than the Duncan. </p>
<p>Thanks. The main need I have for strength is for pulling flies out of brush.  <img src='http://flyfishingfisherman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   Bob  Wondering if it&#8217;s better to break the line at the tippet-to-fly connection  or at the tippet-to-leader . . . </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   I use a no-slip loop knot whenever I want a loop in tippet. It&#8217;s easy to   tie and very strong. </p>
<p>Like Bill says below I&#8217;ve used it as a loop knot on a fly works great and  very strong. Good idea to use as a tippet connector I&#8217;ll have to try. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   I&#8217;ll stop being a banker and   become a guide.   Bob </p>
<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; liar&#44; liar&#44; pants on fire. &nbsp;we all know you&#8217;re an accountant!  yfitons  wayno </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Wayne Knight suggested that Leader Loops are for those people who&#8217;s  fingers are too arthritic or disabled to tie a knot&#44; otherwise one  should use a damn bloodknot for a leader connection.  I have been having problems tying small flies on to tippet (especially  dry flies)&#44; so I now pre-snell/tie them&#44; at my tying table with plenty  of light and magnification&#44; to about 16&quot; &#8211; 18&quot; of tippet and store  them in a thing called a &quot;Pip&#8217;s Box&quot; made by Mack&#8217;s Lure of  Leavenworth&#44; Washington State US (You can hold better than a dozen  flies or so with this thing without tangling the tippet&#44; and it comes  in colors with a see thru lid. &nbsp;I organize my flies by the color of  the box.) &nbsp;My eyesight&#44; especially at twilight or later&#44; is not so  good even with a flashlight. &nbsp;I just can&#8217;t seem to get the tippet thru  then I have a hell of a time tying the knot IF I get it threaded. &nbsp;I  am using Fluorocarbon tippet&#44; these days&#44; and I feel that a blood knot  is not adequate for this material. &nbsp;I then use a Tie-Fast Knot Tying  tippet to the leader with their double splicing knot or double nail  knot as some have described it&#44; which I believe is considerably  stronger than the blood knot&#44; or at least my blood knots anyway&#8230;be  curious to see if anyone else has the same experience.  Just my two cents worth&#44; anyway  Padishar Creel </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   &nbsp; we all know you&#8217;re an accountant!   Always prospecting for business&#44; huh?  Bob </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I think I will&#44; Wayne. I made a leader&#44; per Lefty Kreh&#8217;s directions&#44; for  casting big bugs. However&#44; I used uni to uni knots. I think I will make  another one with blood knots and attach it. I mastered nail knots a long  time ago. Now&#44; I am trying to expand my knot repertoire. I still maintain  that the perfection loop is a myth&#8230;  Bug&#44; et al.  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; cut the fly line&#44; tie the nail and then tie the blood knot&#44; you&#8217;ll feel   much   better <img src='http://flyfishingfisherman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   Hi All&#44;   Connecting the smaller tippet material to the leader we sometimes use a   surgeons loop because it is stronger than a perfection loop. </p>
<p>it is but not by much.(perhaps 3 to 5%). Perfections should give a strength  of 90 to 95% of the line vs 95% plus for a surgeon. The surgeons is a bit  easier to tie though. An attribute of the perfection is that it is perfectly  straight while a surgeon loop may put a bit of an angle in the line.  The strongest loop you can tie is the bimini or some of the variants of this  loop. It&#8217;s complicated and not usually used for a tippet loop in most  applications </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; Hi All&#44;  Connecting the smaller tippet material to the leader we sometimes use a  surgeons loop because it is stronger than a perfection loop.   it is but not by much.(perhaps 3 to 5%). Perfections should give a strength   of 90 to 95% of the line vs 95% plus for a surgeon. The surgeons is a bit   easier to tie though. An attribute of the perfection is that it is perfectly   straight while a surgeon loop may put a bit of an angle in the line. </p>
<p>I use a no-slip loop knot whenever I want a loop in tippet. It&#8217;s easy to  tie and very strong. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Ralph&#44;  &#8212;  Bill Kiene  Kiene&#8217;s Fly Shop  Sacramento&#44; CA&#44; USA  www.kiene.com </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   Hi All&#44;    Connecting the smaller tippet material to the leader we sometimes use a    surgeons loop because it is stronger than a perfection loop.   it is but not by much.(perhaps 3 to 5%). Perfections should give a  strength   of 90 to 95% of the line vs 95% plus for a surgeon. The surgeons is a bit   easier to tie though. An attribute of the perfection is that it is  perfectly   straight while a surgeon loop may put a bit of an angle in the line.   The strongest loop you can tie is the bimini or some of the variants of  this   loop. It&#8217;s complicated and not usually used for a tippet loop in most   applications  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Steve&#44;  Lefty really promoted the non-slip loop knot and now I see most of all using  it with flies we want to move freely like a Clouser minnow.  Thanks.  &#8212;  Bill Kiene  Kiene&#8217;s Fly Shop  Sacramento&#44; CA&#44; USA  www.kiene.com </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  Hi All&#44;   Connecting the smaller tippet material to the leader we sometimes use a   surgeons loop because it is stronger than a perfection loop.    it is but not by much.(perhaps 3 to 5%). Perfections should give a  strength    of 90 to 95% of the line vs 95% plus for a surgeon. The surgeons is a  bit    easier to tie though. An attribute of the perfection is that it is  perfectly    straight while a surgeon loop may put a bit of an angle in the line.   I use a no-slip loop knot whenever I want a loop in tippet. It&#8217;s easy to   tie and very strong.  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Nice contribution. Very helpful. I hope you continue to foster goodwill in  this group and for the sport of fly fishing.  Bugged  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   cut the fly line&#44; tie the nail and then tie the blood knot&#44; you&#8217;ll feel    much    better <img src='http://flyfishingfisherman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />    Better strength-test it on your dick first&#44; Collier.  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  //snip//   &nbsp;Bill&#44; do you have any sense of whether a loop makes a   &nbsp;difference ? &nbsp;I&#8217;ve gone back and forth with loop vs   &nbsp;non-loop connections to clousers (read: am I too tired/   &nbsp;cold/etc to bother) and haven&#8217;t noticed a difference. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going through the same debate. Nail knots are a pain in the ass to tie.  I&#8217;ve been upset enough with loop connectors (they get jammed in the guides)  that I swear never to use them again&#44; but then when it&#8217;s cold and I want to  get a new leader on quickly I capitulate. Have never tried leader links&#44; but  Wolfgang was using one on our Hazel trip and it seemed to be a good compact  connection.  &#8212;  http://rwpatton.home.netcom.com/ </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>bob&#44; i think they&#8217;re talking about a loop&#44; instead of clinch&#44; uni&#44; or  other knot&#44; connection of tippet to fly. &nbsp;anyway&#44; on that assumption&#44;  several experienced and knowledgeable folks in the nc mountains suggest  the loop allows wets&#44; nymphs&#44; and streamers to move about in the water  better and allow more realistic presentation. &nbsp;i use the surgeon&#8217;s loop  at times. &nbsp;i haven&#8217;t been able to tell if there&#8217;s much difference in the  fish&#8217;s appreciation of my effort though&#8230;  jeff  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  //snip//   Bill&#44; do you have any sense of whether a loop makes a   difference ? &nbsp;I&#8217;ve gone back and forth with loop vs   non-loop connections to clousers (read: am I too tired/   cold/etc to bother) and haven&#8217;t noticed a difference.   I&#8217;m going through the same debate. Nail knots are a pain in the ass to tie.   I&#8217;ve been upset enough with loop connectors (they get jammed in the guides)   that I swear never to use them again&#44; but then when it&#8217;s cold and I want to   get a new leader on quickly I capitulate. Have never tried leader links&#44; but   Wolfgang was using one on our Hazel trip and it seemed to be a good compact   connection.   &#8212;   http://rwpatton.home.netcom.com/  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  cut the fly line&#44; tie the nail and then tie the blood knot&#44; you&#8217;ll feel much   better <img src='http://flyfishingfisherman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Better strength-test it on your dick first&#44; Collier. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I&#8217;ve found its hard to beat a perfection loop for most  leader connections. The perfection (if tied properly)  stands straight out from the standing line with no  offset&#44; and the knot strength is near 100%. I use it  on all leader butts (with a whipped loop on the fly  line)&#44; &amp; on all tippet connections down to 4x. &nbsp;5x &amp;  smaller I use a doubled surgeons knot. &nbsp;I think its  easier to tie than a surgeons loop&#44; and&#44; well&#8230;..  it looks cool!  B.J. </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; I personally think the perfection loop is something of a myth or some type   of black magic. For leader loops&#44; is it any better than a surgeon&#8217;s loop?   Bug  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Hi All&#44;  In larger diameter mono like attaching leader to a butt section we use  perfection loops because they are a smaller&#44; cleaner knot and strength is  not an issue.  Connecting the smaller tippet material to the leader we sometimes use a  surgeons loop because it is stronger than a perfection loop.  In larger diameter mono like attaching a leader to a butt section we also  use a blood knot because it is a smaller&#44; cleaner knot.  Connecting the smaller tippet material to the leader we also use a triple  surgeons knot because it is stronger.  &#8212;  Bill Kiene  Kiene&#8217;s Fly Shop  Sacramento&#44; CA&#44; USA  www.kiene.com </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; I personally think the perfection loop is something of a myth or some type   of black magic. For leader loops&#44; is it any better than a surgeon&#8217;s loop?   Bug  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Can someone direct me to a site that will show how to tie the  perfection loop and the surgeon&#8217;s loop??  Tony  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -I personally think the perfection loop is something of a myth or some type  of black magic. For leader loops&#44; is it any better than a surgeon&#8217;s loop?  Bug  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Can someone direct me to a site that will show how to tie the   perfection loop and the surgeon&#8217;s loop??   Tony </p>
<p>Hi Tony&#44; Go here for any knot you&#8217;re apt to use:  http://www.flyanglersonline.com/begin/knots/  Frank Sr. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I personally think the perfection loop is something of a myth or some type  of black magic. For leader loops&#44; is it any better than a surgeon&#8217;s loop?  Bug </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   I personally think the perfection loop is something of a myth or some type   of black magic. For leader loops&#44; is it any better than a surgeon&#8217;s loop? </p>
<p>Leader Loops are for those people who&#8217;s fingers are too arthritic or  disabled to tie a knot&#44; otherwise one should use a damn bloodknot for a  leader connection. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Leader Loops are for those people who&#8217;s fingers are too arthritic or   disabled to tie a knot&#44; otherwise one should use a damn bloodknot for a   leader connection. </p>
<p>Actually&#44; leader loops are used between the flyline and the butt  section&#44; where you aren&#8217;t likely to tie a blood knot. You could use a  nail knot&#44; a &quot;nailless&quot; nail knot&#44; a needle knot&#44; or a Zap-a-Gap  connection&#44; but not a blood knot&#44; unless you&#8217;re either crazy or  desperate or stupid. I&#8217;ve even heard of one person using two clinch  knots&#44; incredibly enough&#44; but I don&#8217;t recommend it. I&#8217;d rather use a  blood knot.  I usually tie a new leader onto the butt section (attached to the  flyline with a leader link) with a blood knot. After quite a few leader  changes I eventually need a new leader link and butt section&#44; but that  takes quite awhile &#8212; maybe once a year on my workhorse rig. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I speaking only from the leader end&#44; agree blood knot to attach a butt  section to a leader. </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   Leader Loops are for those people who&#8217;s fingers are too arthritic or    disabled to tie a knot&#44; otherwise one should use a damn bloodknot for a    leader connection.   Actually&#44; leader loops are used between the flyline and the butt   section&#44; where you aren&#8217;t likely to tie a blood knot. You could use a   nail knot&#44; a &quot;nailless&quot; nail knot&#44; a needle knot&#44; or a Zap-a-Gap   connection&#44; but not a blood knot&#44; unless you&#8217;re either crazy or   desperate or stupid. I&#8217;ve even heard of one person using two clinch   knots&#44; incredibly enough&#44; but I don&#8217;t recommend it. I&#8217;d rather use a   blood knot.   I usually tie a new leader onto the butt section (attached to the   flyline with a leader link) with a blood knot. After quite a few leader   changes I eventually need a new leader link and butt section&#44; but that   takes quite awhile &#8212; maybe once a year on my workhorse rig.  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>You&#8217;re talking about a blood knot to connect the leader to the fly line?? I  wanted to use a nail knot to connect the leader&#44; but the line came with a  loop&#44; and I justed couldn&#8217;t get myself to cut the flyline. Anyway&#44; I&#8217;m not  arthritic or disabled&#44; but I am confused and thick-headed.  Are you saying a loop to loop leader to flyline is bad?  Sorry. Sometimes I am profoundly obtuse  Bug&#44; et al.  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   I personally think the perfection loop is something of a myth or some    type    of black magic. For leader loops&#44; is it any better than a surgeon&#8217;s    loop?   Leader Loops are for those people who&#8217;s fingers are too arthritic or   disabled to tie a knot&#44; otherwise one should use a damn bloodknot for a   leader connection.  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>cut the fly line&#44; tie the nail and then tie the blood knot&#44; you&#8217;ll feel much  better <img src='http://flyfishingfisherman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; You&#8217;re talking about a blood knot to connect the leader to the fly line??  I   wanted to use a nail knot to connect the leader&#44; but the line came with a   loop&#44; and I justed couldn&#8217;t get myself to cut the flyline. Anyway&#44; I&#8217;m not   arthritic or disabled&#44; but I am confused and thick-headed.   Are you saying a loop to loop leader to flyline is bad?   Sorry. Sometimes I am profoundly obtuse   Bug&#44; et al.     I personally think the perfection loop is something of a myth or some     type     of black magic. For leader loops&#44; is it any better than a surgeon&#8217;s     loop?    Leader Loops are for those people who&#8217;s fingers are too arthritic or    disabled to tie a knot&#44; otherwise one should use a damn bloodknot for a    leader connection.  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/loop-knots-1609684.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A 45 year old mystery.</title>
		<link>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/a-45-year-old-mystery-1605422.html</link>
		<comments>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/a-45-year-old-mystery-1605422.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fly Fishing Line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flyfishingfisherman.com/uncategorized/a-45-year-old-mystery-1605422.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
  I have corresponded with a couple entomologists specializing in Mayflies   that were very willing to help me with some questions I had. I can give   you their email addresses if you&#8217;re interested but with the little bit   of information you have (and it is from a forty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>  I have corresponded with a couple entomologists specializing in Mayflies   that were very willing to help me with some questions I had. I can give   you their email addresses if you&#8217;re interested but with the little bit   of information you have (and it is from a forty year old memory) I don&#8217;t   think they will be able to help you. </p>
<p>Agreed. &nbsp;I think the only way to settle this for sure is to find someone  familiar with this particular hatch on that body of water.  Wolfgang </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  I think the prize goes to Tom (a shiny&#44; new nickel) as Kropp and   Cormier&#8217;s &quot;Mayflies&#8217; list the Dark Green Drake as the largest of the   N.A. mayfly species&#44; larger than our hexes. &nbsp;There is quite a size   range with body length ranging from a 16 to 40 millimeters and a   recommended hook size from 12 to a whopping #2.   Um&#8230;Recurvata is Hexagenia Recurvata ((Great) Dark Green Drake)&#44; and   the L. mentioned by Tom is likely from the similar&#44; but smaller&#44; H.   Limbata. &nbsp;While it would seemingly fit Wolfgang&#8217;s description (&quot;Hatches&quot;   even makes mention of it appearing &quot;almost black&quot; on the wing)&#44; it is a   Hexagenia.   Wolfgang &#8211; you said something about being certain it was not hexagenia &#8211;   why?   As H. Recurvata and H. Limbata are close&#44; with the Limbata hatch even   being known mistakenly in Michigan as&#44; again&#44; according to &quot;Hatches&#44;&quot; a   &quot;Caddis Hatch&#44;&quot; and also being called a &quot;Michigan Caddis&quot; or &quot;Michigan   Mayfly.&quot; </p>
<p>H. limbata is much too light colored and too large to be my mystery  bug. &nbsp;Still having trouble getting on the web&#44; so I haven&#8217;t been able to  look at H. recurvata (or Litobrancha recurvata as it now seems to be  called)&#44; or the Epeorus you mentioned earlier for that matter.  I&#8217;m surprised to read that the Green Drake is considered by Kropp and  Cormier to be the largest of the North american mayflies; every  reference I&#8217;ve seen says that honor belongs to H. limbata.  Wolfgang </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>JAFB&#44; Wolfie  &#8212;  TBone </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  I think the prize goes to Tom (a shiny&#44; new nickel) as Kropp and   Cormier&#8217;s &quot;Mayflies&#8217; list the Dark Green Drake as the largest of the   N.A. mayfly species&#44; larger than our hexes. &nbsp;There is quite a size   range with body length ranging from a 16 to 40 millimeters and a   recommended hook size from 12 to a whopping #2.   Um&#8230;Recurvata is Hexagenia Recurvata ((Great) Dark Green Drake)&#44; and   the L. mentioned by Tom is likely from the similar&#44; but smaller&#44; H.   Limbata. &nbsp;While it would seemingly fit Wolfgang&#8217;s description (&quot;Hatches&quot;   even makes mention of it appearing &quot;almost black&quot; on the wing)&#44; it is a   Hexagenia.   Wolfgang &#8211; you said something about being certain it was not hexagenia &#8211;   why?   As H. Recurvata and H. Limbata are close&#44; with the Limbata hatch even   being known mistakenly in Michigan as&#44; again&#44; according to &quot;Hatches&#44;&quot; a   &quot;Caddis Hatch&#44;&quot; and also being called a &quot;Michigan Caddis&quot; or &quot;Michigan   Mayfly.&quot;  H. limbata is much too light colored and too large to be my mystery  bug. &nbsp;Still having trouble getting on the web&#44; so I haven&#8217;t been able to  look at H. recurvata (or Litobrancha recurvata as it now seems to be  called)&#44; or the Epeorus you mentioned earlier for that matter.  I&#8217;m surprised to read that the Green Drake is considered by Kropp and  Cormier to be the largest of the North american mayflies; every  reference I&#8217;ve seen says that honor belongs to H. limbata. </p>
<p>I think you may have that backwards in that I think you&#8217;ll find that  Recurvata is larger than Limbata&#44; but only just. &nbsp;In any case&#44; they are  close enough in size that it doesn&#8217;t really matter &#8211; if one is much too  large&#44; the other will be as well. &nbsp;If they are too large&#44; then color  really doesn&#8217;t matter&#44; but I&#8217;ve seen references that indicate both can  range in color. &nbsp;Based on the information that Recurvata/Limbata is much  too large&#44; I&#8217;d try to get a look at Epeorus. &nbsp;Here&#8217;s a link I found:  http://www.mayfly.com/articles/WW7.html  by Al Caucci  and I&#8217;ve also emailed you a copy of the &quot;suspect.&quot;  TC&#44;  R  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -Wolfgang  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>rdean notes:  Um&#8230;Recurvata is Hexagenia Recurvata ((Great) Dark Green Drake)&#44; </p>
<p>was&#8230;.then got reclassified as Litobrancha  Recurvata. Geez&#44; all this latin has me dizzy. Let me grab a beer!  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Tom </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> rdean notes:  Um&#8230;Recurvata is Hexagenia Recurvata ((Great) Dark Green Drake)&#44;  was&#8230;.then got reclassified as Litobrancha  Recurvata. Geez&#44; all this latin has me dizzy. Let me grab a beer!   &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Tom </p>
<p>Ah&#8230;thanks. &nbsp;I guess then I ought to add that everything I&#8217;ve indicated  in this thread may be equally outdated. &nbsp;I&#8217;m almost afraid to ask&#44;  but&#8230;any idea why?  TC&#44;  R </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  Did it look like this?   http://www.charlesmeck.com/600slatedrake.jpg  That looks a lot more like what I remember. &nbsp;There&#8217;s still a good bit of  brown in this one but&#44; in truth&#44; 40 some years later it&#8217;s hard to be  certain that the bugs I saw and which I was NOT interested in examining  closely did not have some brown. &nbsp;On the other hand&#44; a brief search on  the web shows that both Isonychia bicolor and Isonychia sadleri are  referred to as Slate Drakes and both of these&#44; according to the hatch  charts I looked at&#44; run in the 14-12 size range. &nbsp;Again&#44; it&#8217;s quite  possible that my memory has magnified them&#44; but I&#8217;m fairly certain these  bugs were bigger. </p>
<p>What about an Epeorus variety &#8211; &quot;Iron Dun&#44;&quot; and even &quot;Quill Gordon&#44;&quot;  perhaps&#44; to some (or &quot;Dark Wing Quill Gordon&quot;)? &nbsp;If you have the  Caucci/Nastasi &quot;Hatches&#44;&quot; you will find info there&#44; or perhaps a web  search. &nbsp;If you do the web search&#44; don&#8217;t take the first picture you  find&#44; if it appears unlike the one you remember. &nbsp;I did a search&#44; looked  at a couple&#44; and there seems to be no actual consensus among the few  sites I looked at as to exactly what was what.  I did&#44; however&#44; notice this one&#44; which unfortunately&#44; has no picture:  http://www.maineflyfishing.com/bluedun/pattern.htm  Look under &quot;Quill Gordon&#44;&quot; where it says&#44; &quot;Quill Gordons are called  Epeorus Pleuralis (ee-pee-or-us ploor-alice) by those up on Latin and  just plain old &quot;bigggggg dark mayflies&quot; or &quot;Iron Duns&quot; by the rest of  us. They are big (size 10/12)&#44; dark&#44; have two tails (barred and equal to  their body length)&#44; double &nbsp;wings&#8230;&quot;  TC&#44;  R </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> I think the prize goes to Tom (a shiny&#44; new nickel) as Kropp and  Cormier&#8217;s &quot;Mayflies&#8217; list the Dark Green Drake as the largest of the  N.A. mayfly species&#44; larger than our hexes. &nbsp;There is quite a size  range with body length ranging from a 16 to 40 millimeters and a  recommended hook size from 12 to a whopping #2. </p>
<p>Um&#8230;Recurvata is Hexagenia Recurvata ((Great) Dark Green Drake)&#44; and  the L. mentioned by Tom is likely from the similar&#44; but smaller&#44; H.  Limbata. &nbsp;While it would seemingly fit Wolfgang&#8217;s description (&quot;Hatches&quot;  even makes mention of it appearing &quot;almost black&quot; on the wing)&#44; it is a  Hexagenia. &nbsp;  Wolfgang &#8211; you said something about being certain it was not hexagenia &#8211;  why?  As H. Recurvata and H. Limbata are close&#44; with the Limbata hatch even  being known mistakenly in Michigan as&#44; again&#44; according to &quot;Hatches&#44;&quot; a  &quot;Caddis Hatch&#44;&quot; and also being called a &quot;Michigan Caddis&quot; or &quot;Michigan  Mayfly.&quot;  TC&#44;  R  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -Peter  Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharles/streamers/index.html  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &nbsp;   &nbsp;   &nbsp;  I&#8217;ve found all kinds of good entomological sites on the web&#44; but all  &nbsp;  fall short of what would be ideal for this situation. &nbsp;For example&#44; I  &nbsp;  found a site that has range maps for all known mayfly species within the  &nbsp;  state of Wisconsin (a USGS site&#44; of all the odd places) but as  &nbsp;  interesting&#44; and doubtless valuable&#44; this information is&#44; it&#8217;s pretty  &nbsp;  much useless without cross referenced information regarding appearance&#44;  &nbsp;  habitat&#44; and habit of the target species.  Although the Web has a vast amount of information&#44; it is often difficult  or even impossible to find the specific information that you want. I  would like to see the studies done at public Universities made available  on the Internet. Because the data would need to be inputted&#44; it would be  costly and difficult for older studies&#44; but virtually all current  research is composed on a computer and making them available to the  public wouldn&#8217;t be a monumental task. This access could be a condition  for any researchers getting public funding for their research.  &nbsp;   &nbsp;  Consulting an entomologist has occurred to me&#44; but this is neither as  &nbsp;  easy nor necessarily as promising as it might sound. &nbsp;First&#44; one would  &nbsp;  necessarily have to find an aquatic entomologist (or at least one with a  &nbsp;  specific interest in aquatic species&#8230;..a fly fisher perhaps). &nbsp;I know  &nbsp;  of a good aquatic entomologist at UW&#44; Stevens Point but he happens to  &nbsp;  specialize in plecoptera and&#44; scientific specialties being what they  &nbsp;  are&#44; this might not help much even if I were trying to identify a  &nbsp;  stonefly unless he happened to be a taxonomist or have some other reason  &nbsp;  to be familiar with my target species.  I have corresponded with a couple entomologists specializing in Mayflies  that were very willing to help me with some questions I had. I can give  you their email addresses if you&#8217;re interested but with the little bit  of information you have (and it is from a forty year old memory) I don&#8217;t  think they will be able to help you.  &nbsp;   &nbsp;  As you stated&#44; local subspecies might look and behave a great deal  &nbsp;  differently than expected for a variety of reasons. &nbsp;Hell&#44; it isn&#8217;t even  &nbsp;  unreasonable to suppose that we might be dealing with a species unknown  &nbsp;  to science. &nbsp;Granted&#44; it isn&#8217;t likely but new species (especially of  &nbsp;  small and highly localized arthropods) do turn up from time to time.  &nbsp;  There is also the possibility (admittedly also unlikely) of a known  &nbsp;  species behaving in an uncharacteristic manner. &nbsp;For example&#44; an  &nbsp;  uncommon species might suddenly reproduce successfully in undreamed of  &nbsp;  numbers within a given location due to an unusual and highly beneficial  &nbsp;  confluence of circumstances.  You may very well be right about this. One of the researchers I  contacted said that they were MANY unknown species and local variations.  There just isn&#8217;t much grant money available to study them. The vast  amount of research done on insects is on insect control (where the money  is).  Willi </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  What about an Epeorus variety &#8211; &quot;Iron Dun&#44;&quot; and even &quot;Quill Gordon&#44;&quot;   perhaps&#44; to some (or &quot;Dark Wing Quill Gordon&quot;)? &nbsp;If you have the   Caucci/Nastasi &quot;Hatches&#44;&quot; you will find info there&#44; or perhaps a web   search. &nbsp;If you do the web search&#44; don&#8217;t take the first picture you   find&#44; if it appears unlike the one you remember. &nbsp;I did a search&#44; looked   at a couple&#44; and there seems to be no actual consensus among the few   sites I looked at as to exactly what was what.   I did&#44; however&#44; notice this one&#44; which unfortunately&#44; has no picture:   http://www.maineflyfishing.com/bluedun/pattern.htm   Look under &quot;Quill Gordon&#44;&quot; where it says&#44; &quot;Quill Gordons are called   Epeorus Pleuralis (ee-pee-or-us ploor-alice) by those up on Latin and   just plain old &quot;bigggggg dark mayflies&quot; or &quot;Iron Duns&quot; by the rest of   us. They are big (size 10/12)&#44; dark&#44; have two tails (barred and equal to   their body length)&#44; double &nbsp;wings&#8230;&quot; </p>
<p>Unfortunately&#44; I seem to be unable to access anything on the web right  now. &nbsp;We had some trouble with the college server last week. &nbsp;Looks like  it may not be entirely resolved yet. &nbsp;I&#8217;ll take a look at the Epeorus as  soon as I can.  Thanks  Wolfgang </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> I think the prize goes to Tom (a shiny&#44; new nickel) as Kropp and  Cormier&#8217;s &quot;Mayflies&#8217; list the Dark Green Drake as the largest of the  N.A. mayfly species&#44; larger than our hexes. &nbsp;There is quite a size  range with body length ranging from a 16 to 40 millimeters and a  recommended hook size from 12 to a whopping #2.  According to the book&#44; they are clumsy on takeoff as they are so  large&#44; often skipping across &nbsp;the water. They emerge at dusk or after  sunset being primarily a cool lake species but slow&#44; silty parts of  rivers will hold them too.  BTW&#44; at the beginning of August&#44; we drove through a blizzard light  cahill hatch at dusk. &nbsp;Still trying to get the critters off my car.  Peter  Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharles/streamers/index.html </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  &nbsp; Well&#44; roughly anyway.   Maybe this is it?   Late June through mid July &#8211; Ephemera Simulans&#44; Brown Drake&#44; this is the   most prevalent large mayfly hatch in the Upper Peninsula. </p>
<p>I was fortunate to fish a Brown Drake hatch this year at Silver Creek.  These are by far the largest mayflies I&#8217;ve ever seen&#44; and the hatch was  prolific. The hatch occurs in the evening and through the night&#44; until  it&#8217;s so dark that you can only detect the takes by ear. These bugs live  in slow moving water with a silty bottom. The nymphs are swimmers&#44; and  they&#8217;ll take fish before the hatch with a stripped retrieve.  &#8212;  visit my web site:  http://home.earthlink.net/~royalwulff/ </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>&nbsp;Wolfgang&#44; dear boy. &nbsp;There is only one mayfly that is as prolific as the  ones you describe. &nbsp;Hexagina Limbatas! &nbsp;So thick are they during the early  days that they would cover a cabin and all the screen doors with their  numbers.  God! &nbsp;What an insect!  George Gehrke </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  &nbsp; Well&#44; roughly anyway.   Maybe this is it?   Late June through mid July &#8211; Ephemera Simulans&#44; Brown Drake&#44; this is the   most prevalent large mayfly hatch in the Upper Peninsula.   Willi </p>
<p>Nope. &nbsp;Found a picture of Ephemera simulans:  http://www.flyshop.com/bench/hatchguide/index.cfm?page=bug&#038;row=13  Not the same critter at all. &nbsp;As the common name suggests&#44; this beastie  is brown. &nbsp;The one I remember is black.  Thanks.  Wolfgang </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I think they were some kind of a variation of huge Brown Drake.  Hear me out.  I&#8217;ve got the same question&#8230;  55-60 years ago&#44; when I was growing up in Chicago&#44; I lived on the far north  side 2 blocks from Lake Michigan. &nbsp;Every summer&#44; sometime in June&#44; there was a  massive hatch of Mayflys almost exactly as you describe. &nbsp;They were coming off  the shore of the lake. There was no other body of water within 50 miles that  could support such a hatch. It was so prolific it completely blackened the  street lights&#44; covered the store front windows &#8211; you couldn&#8217;t see out. &nbsp;They  covered the ground so thick they squished under your feet.  I remember some of them having a very dark brown hue as well as slate gray to  black. &nbsp;They were easily size 6 &#8211; 8. &nbsp;They were NOT Hexigina.  I never found out what they were for sure. In recent years I&#8217;ve seen other  similar hatches coming off clear Canadian Lakes that were known to be Brown  Drakes.  Wolf&#44; keep it as a sweet memory of your youth. &nbsp;Dream about someday being on a  stream or lake holding 10 lb. Rainbow when a hatch like that comes off. &nbsp;The  fish go wild and you go bonkers. Heaven. &nbsp;  Joel Axelrad  **DFD** </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Nope. &nbsp;Found a picture of Ephemera simulans:   http://www.flyshop.com/bench/hatchguide/index.cfm?page=bug&#038;row=13   Not the same critter at all. &nbsp;As the common name suggests&#44; this beastie   is brown. &nbsp;The one I remember is black.   Thanks. </p>
<p>Did it look like this?  http://www.charlesmeck.com/600slatedrake.jpg  &#8212;  Warren  change addy to yahoo for email  Henry&#8217;s Fork Clave info  http://www.geocities.com/troutbum_mt3/HFclave.html </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Discounting them by about thirty percent for temporal magnification and   the horror factor still leaves them at a good size eight or even a solid   six&#8230;..and possibly a bit larger.   Any ideas? </p>
<p>wolfie&#44; no discounting&#8230;. it must have been&#8230;.  http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/earth/images/bat_big_jpg_image&#8230;  &#8211;waldo </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Wolfgang asks:  Any ideas? </p>
<p>ask around among the academic types for someone who knows an entomologist.  There are probably very good entomologies online(which may limit access).  People will probably suggest Ephemera and Hexes&#44; but there an awful lot of  obscure mayfly species&#44; and lakes have locale specific subspecies you might  never encounter unless you blunder on them.  I will venture with the closest I have ever seen. It would be:  L(Litobrancha?).Recurvata&#44; which was once classified with the Hexes. In PA they  are called Dark Green Drakes. They hatch at or into dark&#44; sometimes on real  cloudy days&#44; a bit earlier&#44; say 7 PM. They are huge&#44; maybe bigger than the  Green Drakes. The bodies are a darkish grey&#44; with rings of paler yellow tan  along the abdomen. Wings are a smokey grey&#44; mottled somewhat. They look nasty&#44;  as they are a bit heftier in the body(squatter&#44; might be better). Hatched out  of a silty pool in Penns one night on Makela and I&#44; fish going silly&#44; no good  imitations&#44; massive bugs in mouth and hair&#44; etc.etc. That was in 1993&#44; haven&#8217;t  seen one since.  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Tom </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Did it look like this?   http://www.charlesmeck.com/600slatedrake.jpg </p>
<p>That looks a lot more like what I remember. &nbsp;There&#8217;s still a good bit of  brown in this one but&#44; in truth&#44; 40 some years later it&#8217;s hard to be  certain that the bugs I saw and which I was NOT interested in examining  closely did not have some brown. &nbsp;On the other hand&#44; a brief search on  the web shows that both Isonychia bicolor and Isonychia sadleri are  referred to as Slate Drakes and both of these&#44; according to the hatch  charts I looked at&#44; run in the 14-12 size range. &nbsp;Again&#44; it&#8217;s quite  possible that my memory has magnified them&#44; but I&#8217;m fairly certain these  bugs were bigger.  All in all&#44; I think uncle Wally&#8217;s candidate looks the most  promising. &nbsp; &nbsp; <img src='http://flyfishingfisherman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Wolfgang </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   Discounting them by about thirty percent for temporal magnification and    the horror factor still leaves them at a good size eight or even a solid    six&#8230;..and possibly a bit larger.    Any ideas?   wolfie&#44; no discounting&#8230;. it must have been&#8230;.   http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/earth/images/bat_big_jpg_image&#8230; </p>
<p>THAT&#8217;S IT! &nbsp;I&#8217;d recognize the bastard anywhere!  Wolfgang  who is reasonably certain he doesn&#8217;t even want to know what the nymphs  look like. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;:( </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  I think they were some kind of a variation of huge Brown Drake.   Hear me out.   I&#8217;ve got the same question&#8230;   55-60 years ago&#44; when I was growing up in Chicago&#44; I lived on the far north   side 2 blocks from Lake Michigan. &nbsp;Every summer&#44; sometime in June&#44; there was a   massive hatch of Mayflys almost exactly as you describe. &nbsp;They were coming off   the shore of the lake. There was no other body of water within 50 miles that   could support such a hatch. It was so prolific it completely blackened the   street lights&#44; covered the store front windows &#8211; you couldn&#8217;t see out. &nbsp;They   covered the ground so thick they squished under your feet. </p>
<p>I remember talking about this with you&#44; but I don&#8217;t recall whether you  said anything about the substrate there. &nbsp;The bugs I encountered would  almost have to have been burrowers. &nbsp;The bottom of this lake was very  soft&#8230;.even very near shore where turbulence would wash away at least  some of the muck you would sink at least ankle deep in the stuff. &nbsp;I&#8217;m  not intimately familiar with the Lake Michigan shoreline in the Chicago  area&#44; so I may have missed it&#44; but I don&#8217;t believe there&#8217;s any large  protected area that would have that kind of soft bottom. &nbsp;Do you know of  any such?   I remember some of them having a very dark brown hue as well as slate gray to   black. &nbsp;They were easily size 6 &#8211; 8. &nbsp; </p>
<p>Size and color scheme sound about right.   They were NOT Hexigina. </p>
<p>Absolutely right. &nbsp;Impossible to mistake the Hex for anything else.  Moreover&#44; while I don&#8217;t remember just how long they were around&#44; we  encountered them when we first left the cottage in the morning&#44; which  would have been fairly early (at a cottage on a lake in what we thought  of as the north woods nothing&#8230;..well&#44; almost nothing&#8230;could keep us  indoors much past sunrise on a sunny day) and I remember that we stayed  inside for the rest of the day&#44; and perhaps even the next. &nbsp;These bugs  were active&#8230;.VERY active&#8230;.throughout the day.   I never found out what they were for sure. In recent years I&#8217;ve seen other   similar hatches coming off clear Canadian Lakes that were known to be Brown   Drakes. </p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t you also tell me the last time we talked about them that you  thought you had seen them again in the Chicago area&#8230;..or am I  imagining that?   Wolf&#44; keep it as a sweet memory of your youth. &nbsp;Dream about someday being on a   stream or lake holding 10 lb. Rainbow when a hatch like that comes off. &nbsp;The   fish go wild and you go bonkers. Heaven. </p>
<p>Pretty picture! &nbsp;Somewhat surprisingly&#44; perhaps&#44; I find the thought of  finding the hatch again even more appealing than the idea of the monster  fish.  Wolfgang  we need to talk logistics concerning the upcoming trip. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Wolfgang writes&#8230;  but I don&#8217;t believe there&#8217;s any large  protected area that would have that kind of soft bottom. &nbsp;Do you know of  any such? </p>
<p>That&#8217;s true. &nbsp;It was a clean sandy bottom. &nbsp;Not protected. &nbsp;Well washed &nbsp;by the  wave action. &nbsp;Vegatation about 30 to 50 yds out from shore.  Didn&#8217;t you also tell me the last time we talked about them that you  thought you had seen them again in the Chicago area&#8230;..or am I  imagining that? </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so. &nbsp;You&#8217;re imagining.  Pretty picture! &nbsp;Somewhat surprisingly&#44; perhaps&#44; I find the thought of  finding the hatch again even more appealing than the idea of the monster  fish.  Wolfgang </p>
<p>I still think they were Brown Drakes. &nbsp;Looked a lot like the picture from the  web site Warren posted. &nbsp;But they were 6 &amp; 8 for sure &#8211; not 10 &amp; 12.  Big guys! &nbsp;I&#8217;ll dream of catching 10 lb. rainbow. &nbsp;You dream of being blanketed  by a hatch of monster mayflys.  we need to talk logistics concerning the upcoming trip. </p>
<p>Let me know the details.  Joel Axelrad  **DFD** </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Wolfgang asks:   Any ideas?   ask around among the academic types for someone who knows an entomologist.   There are probably very good entomologies online(which may limit access). </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found all kinds of good entomological sites on the web&#44; but all  fall short of what would be ideal for this situation. &nbsp;For example&#44; I  found a site that has range maps for all known mayfly species within the  state of Wisconsin (a USGS site&#44; of all the odd places) but as  interesting&#44; and doubtless valuable&#44; this information is&#44; it&#8217;s pretty  much useless without cross referenced information regarding appearance&#44;  habitat&#44; and habit of the target species. &nbsp;Other sites have much of that  information&#44; but matching the information on various sites is daunting&#44;  to say the least. &nbsp;I have found some references to individual species  which sounded promising for one reason or another but in many cases have  been unable to find photographs of the bugs in question&#8230;.and on and  on.  Consulting an entomologist has occurred to me&#44; but this is neither as  easy nor necessarily as promising as it might sound. &nbsp;First&#44; one would  necessarily have to find an aquatic entomologist (or at least one with a  specific interest in aquatic species&#8230;..a fly fisher perhaps). &nbsp;I know  of a good aquatic entomologist at UW&#44; Stevens Point but he happens to  specialize in plecoptera and&#44; scientific specialties being what they  are&#44; this might not help much even if I were trying to identify a  stonefly unless he happened to be a taxonomist or have some other reason  to be familiar with my target species.   People will probably suggest Ephemera and Hexes&#44; but there an awful lot of   obscure mayfly species&#44; and lakes have locale specific subspecies you might   never encounter unless you blunder on them. </p>
<p>Right&#44; on all counts. &nbsp;Both Ephemera and Isonychia look like good  candidates based on photos&#44; but both are questionable on the basis of  size. &nbsp;I don&#8217;t yet know enough about habit or habitat with regard to  either genus. &nbsp;Hexagenia limbata is definitely out for a variety of  reasons.  As you stated&#44; local subspecies might look and behave a great deal  differently than expected for a variety of reasons. &nbsp;Hell&#44; it isn&#8217;t even  unreasonable to suppose that we might be dealing with a species unknown  to science. &nbsp;Granted&#44; it isn&#8217;t likely but new species (especially of  small and highly localized arthropods) do turn up from time to time.  There is also the possibility (admittedly also unlikely) of a known  species behaving in an uncharacteristic manner. &nbsp;For example&#44; an  uncommon species might suddenly reproduce successfully in undreamed of  numbers within a given location due to an unusual and highly beneficial  confluence of circumstances.   I will venture with the closest I have ever seen. It would be:   L(Litobrancha?).Recurvata&#44; which was once classified with the Hexes. </p>
<p>I just looked up Litobrancha. &nbsp;Interestingly&#44; the first hit I looked at  was a UW Stevens Point website which contains a list of &quot;AQUATIC INSECTS  OF WISCONSIN RECENT SYNONYMS AT SPECIFIC OR HIGHER LEVELS&quot; authored by  none other than Stanley W. Szczytko&#44; the aquatic entomologist I  mentioned above&#44; and Jeffrey J. Dimick&#44; who used to be (and quite  possibly still is) president of a local TU chapter in the area. &nbsp;They  list Litobrancha &nbsp;in the &quot;recent taxonomy&quot; column next to Hexagenia (in  part) under &quot;prior taxonomy&quot;&#44; and Litobrancha recurvata next to  Hexagenia recurvata. &nbsp;Looking at another dozen or sites&#44; I have not yet  found a photo. &nbsp;I&#8217;ll keep working on this one.   In PA they   are called Dark Green Drakes. They hatch at or into dark&#44; sometimes on real   cloudy days&#44; a bit earlier&#44; say 7 PM. They are huge&#44; maybe bigger than the   Green Drakes. The bodies are a darkish grey&#44; with rings of paler yellow tan   along the abdomen. Wings are a smokey grey&#44; mottled somewhat. They look nasty&#44;   as they are a bit heftier in the body(squatter&#44; might be better). Hatched out   of a silty pool in Penns one night on Makela and I&#44; fish going silly&#44; no good   imitations&#44; massive bugs in mouth and hair&#44; etc.etc. That was in 1993&#44; haven&#8217;t   seen one since. </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t sound like my bug. &nbsp;I don&#8217;t know when they came off&#44; but they  were very active through a bright sunny day. &nbsp;Of course&#44; it must be  remembered that I&#8217;m basing all of this on memories of an event that  occurred more than forty years ago and that I was not much interested in  close observation of the bugs at the time. &nbsp;In all likelihood&#44; I&#8217;ll  never be able to solve this mystery. &nbsp;I thought (and I still do) that my  best bet was to put it out here and hope that someone just happens to be  familiar with this hatch in this particular place. &nbsp;I think it&#8217;s just  about time for a brilliant lurker with an encyclopedic knowledge of the  Ephemeroptera to show him or herself and demonstrate how pitiful the  rest of us really are. &nbsp; &nbsp; <img src='http://flyfishingfisherman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Wolfgang  thanks tom. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &nbsp; Well&#44; roughly anyway.  &nbsp;  Maybe this is it?  Late June through mid July &#8211; Ephemera Simulans&#44; Brown Drake&#44; this is the  most prevalent large mayfly hatch in the Upper Peninsula.  Willi </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Well&#44; roughly anyway.  My father&#8217;s cousin&#44; Sam Friederich&#44; owned a couple acres of land and a  cottage (a dacha&#44; as a Russian physicist I recently spoke with&#44; &quot;&#8230;not  what YOU call a cottage here!&quot; called it) on Kangaroo lake in Door  County&#44; Wisconsin. &nbsp;For those not familiar with the area&#44; Door County is  the long finger of land which runs to the northeast up into Lake  Michigan and thus forms Green Bay to the west.  Kangaroo lake&#44; http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?lat=45.0325&#038;lon=-87.15889  was&#44; in the late 1950s&#44; lightly developed. &nbsp;There were a couple of small  resorts&#44; a few permanent year round homes&#44; several cottages like the one  we frequently stayed at&#44; all of them on the larger&#44; southern section of  the lake south of the causeway&#44; and a single very large estate on the  island. &nbsp;Whatever organic pollutants entered the lake as a result of  human habitation were still minimal at that time. &nbsp;In other words&#44; the  water was very clean and the biome had probably changed little since  pre-Columbian times. &nbsp;Kangaroo lake was a wonderful place to swim&#44; even  for city bred kids like me&#44; as long as one didn&#8217;t allow one&#8217;s feet to  touch the bottom. &nbsp;The lake bed was marl&#44; and thus about as icky a thing  to come into contact with as was imagineable&#8230;.except&#44; of course&#44; for  the things that actually LIVED in that oozy bottom!  One day all those things that lived in the bottom (although I didn&#8217;t  realize their origin at the time) came out. &nbsp;The air was filled with  bugs. &nbsp;Millions of bugs. &nbsp;Maybe billions of bugs. &nbsp;They were so bold or  so crazed or stupid that they would land on anything or anybody. &nbsp;Adult  reassurances that they were perfectly harmless fell on deaf ears and  neither I nor my brothers or sister could be coaxed to go outside for  any reason&#8230;..threats and coercion worked&#44; but you get the picture.  In the ensuing years&#44; I have often wondered exactly what those bugs  were. &nbsp;My interest in fly fishing&#44; running close onto twenty years worth  now&#44; makes it easy to say with certainty that they were some variety of  mayfly&#44; but I still haven&#8217;t been able to identify the species.  Discounting them by about thirty percent for temporal magnification and  the horror factor still leaves them at a good size eight or even a solid  six&#8230;..and possibly a bit larger. &nbsp;They were a dark&#44; slate gray to  nearly black and&#44; if memory serves after all these years&#44; they were  almost certainly duns or sub-imagos&#8230;.dark&#44; nearly opaque wings.  On a couple of occasions in the last two or three years I&#8217;ve made  occasional efforts to locate resources on line which might solve the  mystery for me but have&#44; as yet&#44; had no success.  Any ideas?  Wolfgang </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/a-45-year-old-mystery-1605422.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USA Today</title>
		<link>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/usa-today-1614746.html</link>
		<comments>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/usa-today-1614746.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fly Fishing Line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flyfishingfisherman.com/uncategorized/usa-today-1614746.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
Allen  As a retired labor economist&#44; harumph&#44; harumph. . . you are on the money  ($25-35) for most of the biz/corp and entry pilots. And the folks flying the  regional nets don&#8217;t get much more. Same goes for mechanics&#44; helo pilots etc.  Folks do it for the love of aviation near [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>Allen  As a retired labor economist&#44; harumph&#44; harumph. . . you are on the money  ($25-35) for most of the biz/corp and entry pilots. And the folks flying the  regional nets don&#8217;t get much more. Same goes for mechanics&#44; helo pilots etc.  Folks do it for the love of aviation near as I can tell. Dime a dozen here  in Seattle area. As to the $200k after 10-12 years with a major. . . I think  you are high&#44; but I never did a formal analysis of the high end.  Dave </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> I know that&#8217;s why *I* started &#8211; to meet a better class of people. <img src='http://flyfishingfisherman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   &#8212;  TL&#44;  Tim (the elitest) </p>
<p>Years ago&#44; Ed Zern wrote a column refuting the notion that only a  better class of people fly fish. &nbsp;He said one of the most skillful  dry-fly men he ever saw owned a string of sporting houses up and down  the East Coast.  vince norris </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Years ago&#44; Ed Zern&#8230;said one of the most skillful   dry-fly men he ever saw owned a string of sporting houses up and down   the East Coast. </p>
<p>Still&#44; fly fishing must attract SOME people of lesser quality&#44; don&#8217;tcha  think? &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;:)  Wolfgang </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Those guys had access to a private jet? From my experiences as a Grand  Canyon Guide&#44; you probably could have chatted up those pilots&#44; showed them  a  casting trick or two&#44; and gotten an invite to get flown somewhere in  return.  A friend of mine is a pilot and flew for an oil man for a while back  when oil was king. He didn&#8217;t have much&#44; if any&#44; latitude at all where  the plane went or who went along &#8211; but he did get to fish with his  boss when he flew him on fishing trips. </p>
<p>Did he ever &#8216;drop your name&#8217; to his boss as a potential fishing partner? Of  course&#44; a lot depends on the relationship between boss&#44; pilot and plane&#44; but  I bet many pilots who regularly fly for the same owner would be good people  to be chums with.  A ladyfriend of mine got a free sail around the world when she became chummy  with the captain of some oil magnates yacht.  riverman </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> Did he ever &#8216;drop your name&#8217; to his boss as a potential fishing partner? Of  course&#44; a lot depends on the relationship between boss&#44; pilot and plane&#44; but  I bet many pilots who regularly fly for the same owner would be good people  to be chums with. </p>
<p>I never asked him to &#8216;drop my name&#8217;&#44; but another friend we both grew  up with was always trying to mooch something and I don&#8217;t think he was  very successful. My pilot friend wanted to move on up to an airline  job and I wasn&#8217;t interested in asking him to risk anything with his  boss. It would probably be easier if you could find someone at the end  of their career who didn&#8217;t give a shit. &lt;g  &#8212;  Charlie&#8230; </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   &nbsp;USA Today has an article today (June 21) about executives   &nbsp;and flyfishing. &nbsp;&quot;There&#8217;s something about flyfishing that   &nbsp;attracts people who rise to the top.&quot; &nbsp;etc&#8230;   Remove &quot;XX&quot; from address </p>
<p>From their site:  &quot;Fly fishing is not the passive sport of putting a worm on a hook. It&#8217;s a  graceful back-and-forth casting in the air of fishing line and feathers tied  tight to a hook and the skilled landing of the fly atop the water&#44; insect  manna from heaven to a finicky fish.&quot;  Who in the hell have they been watching?  John </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  &nbsp;USA Today has an article today (June 21) about executives   &nbsp;and flyfishing. &nbsp;&quot;There&#8217;s something about flyfishing that   &nbsp;attracts people who rise to the top.&quot; &nbsp;etc&#8230;   Remove &quot;XX&quot; from address  From their site:  &quot;Fly fishing is not the passive sport of putting a worm on a hook. It&#8217;s a  graceful back-and-forth casting in the air of fishing line and feathers tied  tight to a hook and the skilled landing of the fly atop the water&#44; insect  manna from heaven to a finicky fish.&quot;  Who in the hell have they been watching?  John </p>
<p>Not me&#44; that&#8217;s fer sure.  Peter  Visit The Streamer Page at http://home.cogeco.ca/~pcharles/streamers/index.html </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Private pilots for an executive? &nbsp;Heh&#44; heh&#44; heh. &nbsp;They make a helluva lot more   than the average roffian and should be able to pay for their own flyfishing   vacation. &nbsp;But&#44; still&#8230;.. &nbsp;perhaps the exec thinks familiarity breeds   contempt. </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t get the impression from either of those groups of private  pilots that they were rolling in dough. They were doing OK&#44; about like  your average professional. Not as well as you&#44; Dave.  The first group I met&#44; a couple of years ago&#44; had just flown Edgar  Bronfman&#44; Jr. (of Seagram&#8217;s) in for a society weekend in Sun Valley. I  was naturally curious about the lifestyles of the rich and famous&#44; so I  asked questions. Bronfman&#8217;s jet was a Gulfstream IV&#44; which&#44; if I recall  correctly&#44; they said cost $60 million. They that said he (or the  company) had more than one &#8212; they weren&#8217;t sure how many&#44; but at least  two. It required a crew of three and cost $5000/hr to operate (not  including the crew). Incredible.  Those pilots had never flyfished before&#44; and there they were fishing the  morning Trico spinner fall on Silver Creek&#44; with #12 Royal Wulffs and 5x  tippet&#44; slapping the water on their backcasts. I&#8217;d never fished that  hatch before either&#44; but I was prepared&#44; with the right flies and 7x  tippet. I got really lucky and picked a spot right above a large pod of  fish. Caught three nice &#8216;bows. (Yeah&#44; I know&#44; Wolfgang&#44; you insufferable  dipshit.) They thought I was a fishing god. If only they knew.  I gave them tippet and some flies&#44; and told them about the spring-creek  downstream presentation&#44; but it didn&#8217;t do any good that day. Maybe if  they came back later it helped.  &#8212;  visit my web site:  http://home.earthlink.net/~royalwulff/ </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  jet was a Gulfstream IV&#44; which&#44; if I recall   correctly&#44; they said cost $60 million </p>
<p>check out these guys:  http://www.eclipseaviation.com/  bruce h </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>You&#8217;d be surprised. Corporate pilots generally don&#8217;t make a much money  at all. It&#8217;s a way to build multi-engine turbine flight time and get to  a major airline where they make more money than I care to think about  (after 4 years that is) The corporate pilot lifestyle often is an  on-call job so having a life is tough unless it&#8217;s a big company that has  multiple aircraft and crews. Even at a major airline first year pilot  pay is only about $20K but generally by the time you get to 10 or 12  years and a Captain you&#8217;re up above $200K  Allen Epps  Catonsville&#44; MD  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  rw writes:  Silver Creek snipped   Private pilots for an executive? &nbsp;Heh&#44; heh&#44; heh. &nbsp;They make a helluva lot more   than the average roffian and should be able to pay for their own flyfishing   vacation. &nbsp;But&#44; still&#8230;.. &nbsp;perhaps the exec thinks familiarity breeds   contempt. &nbsp;   Dave  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>i&#8217;ll put silver creek &quot;on the must see list&quot;&#8230;  thanx&#8230; </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   silver creek&#8230;as in near gramby&#44; co??   No. It&#8217;s near Picabo&#44; ID. (Also fairly near Bellevue&#44; Hailey&#44; and   Ketchum&#44; and about 100 miles from Stanley&#44; my home town.)   Silver Creek&#44; Idaho is a famous spring creek &#8212; one of the very best in   the Western US. Much of it is public water&#44; so it gets a lot of   pressure. I especially like to fish it in the Fall&#44; when I&#8217;m sometimes   the only one there.   You&#8217;re going to be in Ketchum in August&#44; right&#44; beancounter? If so&#44; you   just HAVE pay a visit to Silver Creek. Even if you don&#8217;t catch one of   those notoriously selective trout&#44; it&#8217;s worth the experience.   &#8212;   visit my web site:   http://home.earthlink.net/~royalwulff/  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &#8230; They thought I was a fishing god. If only they knew.  I gave them tippet and some flies&#44; and told them about the spring-creek  downstream presentation&#44; but it didn&#8217;t do any good that day. Maybe if  they came back later it helped. </p>
<p>Those guys had access to a private jet? From my experiences as a Grand  Canyon Guide&#44; you probably could have chatted up those pilots&#44; showed them a  casting trick or two&#44; and gotten an invite to get flown somewhere in return.  Folks would wait 5 years and pay thousands of dollars to do Canyon trips&#44;  but I had access to the boats&#44; gear&#44; and was doing 4-6 trips a year. I could  &lt;easily get someone on a trip&#44; or arrange a private trip somewhere if  someone turned out to be an interesting person and was interested.  One mans inaccessible luxury is another mans day-to-day.  riverman </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> Those guys had access to a private jet? From my experiences as a Grand  Canyon Guide&#44; you probably could have chatted up those pilots&#44; showed them a  casting trick or two&#44; and gotten an invite to get flown somewhere in return. </p>
<p>A friend of mine is a pilot and flew for an oil man for a while back  when oil was king. He didn&#8217;t have much&#44; if any&#44; latitude at all where  the plane went or who went along &#8211; but he did get to fish with his  boss when he flew him on fishing trips.  &#8212;  Charlie&#8230; </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>silver creek&#8230;as in near gramby&#44; co?? </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; When I was at Silver Creek a couple of weeks ago I met two pilots who   fly a private jet. Oddly&#44; this was the second time that&#8217;s happened to me   at Silver Creek. They&#8217;d flown in some super wealthy Chicago commodities   trader who was fishing exclusive private water all over the western  Rockies.   We got to talking about how those super rich people lead such different   lives from us. They were kind of bitter about it&#44; complaining about how   cheap their boss was and how he&#8217;d never dream of inviting them to fish   the private water. I said that we have more fun than they do&#44; and those   guys agreed with a laugh.   &#8212;   visit my web site:   http://home.earthlink.net/~royalwulff/  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  silver creek&#8230;as in near gramby&#44; co?? </p>
<p>No. It&#8217;s near Picabo&#44; ID. (Also fairly near Bellevue&#44; Hailey&#44; and  Ketchum&#44; and about 100 miles from Stanley&#44; my home town.)  Silver Creek&#44; Idaho is a famous spring creek &#8212; one of the very best in  the Western US. Much of it is public water&#44; so it gets a lot of  pressure. I especially like to fish it in the Fall&#44; when I&#8217;m sometimes  the only one there.  You&#8217;re going to be in Ketchum in August&#44; right&#44; beancounter? If so&#44; you  just HAVE pay a visit to Silver Creek. Even if you don&#8217;t catch one of  those notoriously selective trout&#44; it&#8217;s worth the experience.  &#8212;  visit my web site:  http://home.earthlink.net/~royalwulff/ </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>rw writes:  When I was at Silver Creek a couple of weeks ago I met two pilots who  fly a private jet. Oddly&#44; this was the second time that&#8217;s happened to me  at Silver Creek. They&#8217;d flown in some super wealthy Chicago commodities  trader who was fishing exclusive private water all over the western Rockies.  We got to talking about how those super rich people lead such different  lives from us. They were kind of bitter about it&#44; complaining about how  cheap their boss was and how he&#8217;d never dream of inviting them to fish  the private water. I said that we have more fun than they do&#44; and those  guys agreed with a laugh. </p>
<p>Private pilots for an executive? &nbsp;Heh&#44; heh&#44; heh. &nbsp;They make a helluva lot more  than the average roffian and should be able to pay for their own flyfishing  vacation. &nbsp;But&#44; still&#8230;.. &nbsp;perhaps the exec thinks familiarity breeds  contempt. &nbsp;  Dave </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   Tim J writes:   Maybe what they&#8217;re saying is that if you flyfish&#44; you are in the top   percentile of the human race. I know that&#8217;s why *I* started &#8211; to meet a   better class of people. <img src='http://flyfishingfisherman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />    &#8212;   Yeah&#44; and ya ended up with me&#44; Fortenberry&#44; Wolfie&#44; wayno&#44; walt&#44; Jeffie&#44;  rw&#44;   Warren&#44; all the Waynes&#44; a Reid&#44; and anyone else who calls himself a  roffian.   Seems like you got screwed! &nbsp;d;0)   Dave </p>
<p>You&#8217;re telling me! <img src='http://flyfishingfisherman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   &#8212;  TL&#44;  Tim  . . . but you guys ended up with me&#44; so we&#8217;re even! </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>When I was at Silver Creek a couple of weeks ago I met two pilots who  fly a private jet. Oddly&#44; this was the second time that&#8217;s happened to me  at Silver Creek. They&#8217;d flown in some super wealthy Chicago commodities  trader who was fishing exclusive private water all over the western Rockies.  We got to talking about how those super rich people lead such different  lives from us. They were kind of bitter about it&#44; complaining about how  cheap their boss was and how he&#8217;d never dream of inviting them to fish  the private water. I said that we have more fun than they do&#44; and those  guys agreed with a laugh.  &#8212;  visit my web site:  http://home.earthlink.net/~royalwulff/ </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Uh&#44; Allen&#44; the term is &quot;bottom dwellers&quot; &#8211; I don&#8217;t think I want to be   known as a nymph &#8211; don&#8217;t have the bod for it.  So&#8230;..&#44; you would be a celibate slut? </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that even I could pull off that contradiction &nbsp;. . .  Peter  Visit The Streamer Page at http://home.cogeco.ca/~pcharles/streamers/index.html </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Umm perhaps I should clarify I meant to type nymphers. Musta been the  coupla Ciders I&#8217;ve had to celebrate Friday.  Allen  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  Uh&#44; Allen&#44; the term is &quot;bottom dwellers&quot; &#8211; I don&#8217;t think I want to be   known as a nymph &#8211; don&#8217;t have the bod for it.   Peter   Visit The Streamer Page at http://home.cogeco.ca/~pcharles/streamers/index.html  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Tim J writes:  Maybe what they&#8217;re saying is that if you flyfish&#44; you are in the top  percentile of the human race. I know that&#8217;s why *I* started &#8211; to meet a  better class of people. <img src='http://flyfishingfisherman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   &#8212; </p>
<p>Yeah&#44; and ya ended up with me&#44; Fortenberry&#44; Wolfie&#44; wayno&#44; walt&#44; Jeffie&#44; rw&#44;  Warren&#44; all the Waynes&#44; a Reid&#44; and anyone else who calls himself a roffian.  Seems like you got screwed! &nbsp;d;0)  Dave </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  &nbsp;USA Today has an article today (June 21) about executives   &nbsp;and flyfishing. &nbsp;&quot;There&#8217;s something about flyfishing that   &nbsp;attracts people who rise to the top.&quot; &nbsp;etc&#8230;   Remove &quot;XX&quot; from address  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> Uh&#44; Allen&#44; the term is &quot;bottom dwellers&quot; &#8211; I don&#8217;t think I want to be  known as a nymph &#8211; don&#8217;t have the bod for it.  Peter  Visit The Streamer Page at http://home.cogeco.ca/~pcharles/streamers/index.html </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> Uh&#44; Allen&#44; the term is &quot;bottom dwellers&quot; &#8211; I don&#8217;t think I want to be   known as a nymph &#8211; don&#8217;t have the bod for it. </p>
<p>So&#8230;..&#44; you would be a celibate slut?  &#8212;  Frank Reid  Reverse email to reply. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   &nbsp;USA Today has an article today (June 21) about executives   &nbsp;and flyfishing. &nbsp;&quot;There&#8217;s something about flyfishing that   &nbsp;attracts people who rise to the top.&quot; &nbsp;etc&#8230; </p>
<p>Maybe what they&#8217;re saying is that if you flyfish&#44; you are in the top  percentile of the human race. I know that&#8217;s why *I* started &#8211; to meet a  better class of people. <img src='http://flyfishingfisherman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   &#8212;  TL&#44;  Tim (the elitest) </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/usa-today-1614746.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TR with a couple pics and 555 line</title>
		<link>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/tr-with-a-couple-pics-and-555-line-1614780.html</link>
		<comments>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/tr-with-a-couple-pics-and-555-line-1614780.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fly Fishing Line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flyfishingfisherman.com/uncategorized/tr-with-a-couple-pics-and-555-line-1614780.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
  New flyline review: &#160;the 555 5 weight double taper 
I thought you were a Dorber man.    &#8212;  visit my web site:  http://home.earthlink.net/~royalwulff/ 

Response:
   You have to make sure you seal that fly line before you use it. &#160;The core   can take on water and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>  New flyline review: &nbsp;the 555 5 weight double taper </p>
<p>I thought you were a Dorber man. <img src='http://flyfishingfisherman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   &#8212;  visit my web site:  http://home.earthlink.net/~royalwulff/ </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   You have to make sure you seal that fly line before you use it. &nbsp;The core   can take on water and sink the line like that if you are not careful. &nbsp;I   had the same problem and just hung the line out to dry for a few days and   then sealed the end with some Aquaseal. </p>
<p>Hmmm&#44; good &quot;tip&quot; &nbsp;(get it?) &nbsp;I&#8217;m surprised they don&#8217;t seal it off at the  factory! </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Hmmm&#44; good &quot;tip&quot; &nbsp;(get it?) &nbsp;I&#8217;m surprised they don&#8217;t seal it off at the   factory! </p>
<p>You must be much better at tying knots than I am. &nbsp;I mean if you can tie  a nail knot or any other knot used for connecting a leader to a fly line  and not have any tag left over to trim&#8230;&#8230; &nbsp;;-)  &#8212;  Warren  change addy to yahoo for email  Henry&#8217;s Fork Clave info  and Bozeman&#44; MT fishing info  http://www.geocities.com/troutbum_mt3/HFclave.html </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  New flyline review: &nbsp;the 555 5 weight double taper seemed to cast and shoot    great. &nbsp;Roll casting is a breeze&#44; even for a goofball caster like me. But    the tip sinks like any other line&#44; in fact probably worse.   You have to make sure you seal that fly line before you use it. &nbsp;The core   can take on water and sink the line like that if you are not careful. &nbsp;I   had the same problem and just hung the line out to dry for a few days and   then sealed the end with some Aquaseal. &nbsp; </p>
<p>BTW&#44; Don&#8217;t use the 555 line in cold weather or on a cold water  tailwater. &nbsp;The line holds memory like no other. &nbsp;I&#8217;ve owned a number of  other lines including my favorites&#44; RIO&#44; and have never had the problems  with a line like my new 555. &nbsp;From the sinking tip to the fly line  memory&#44; to the horrible customer support from Cortland. &nbsp;No more  cortland lines for this guy.  &#8212;  I fly fish so therefore I am. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  BTW&#44; Don&#8217;t use the 555 line in cold weather or on a cold water   tailwater. &nbsp;The line holds memory like no other </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t notice any memory problems at all. &nbsp;The line was fine except for  the sinking tip. &nbsp;And the San Juan is about 44 degrees.  Cortland told me to send it back and they&#8217;d replace it immediately.  I&#8217;m also surprised that Cortland doesn&#8217;t recommend sealing the end of the  line.  bruce h </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  BTW&#44; Don&#8217;t use the 555 line in cold weather or on a cold water    tailwater. &nbsp;The line holds memory like no other   I didn&#8217;t notice any memory problems at all. &nbsp;The line was fine except for   the sinking tip. &nbsp;And the San Juan is about 44 degrees.   Cortland told me to send it back and they&#8217;d replace it immediately. </p>
<p>Interesting. &nbsp;The email told me to continually stretch it out every day  before use and even during the day if necessary! <img src='http://flyfishingfisherman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  &nbsp;It was a free fly  line so I didn&#8217;t really press the issue. &nbsp;Based upon all my problems  with the line and I have read others report similar problems on other  fly fishing boards&#44; I think they have some problems with the line or at  least with the production. &nbsp;Even the shop who provided the free lines  for a fly swap&#44; believes that something is wrong with the lines!   I&#8217;m also surprised that Cortland doesn&#8217;t recommend sealing the end of the   line. </p>
<p>This is such BS. &nbsp;Why in the heck do you buy a new fly line when you  need to prep the thing with Zap a Gap or similar? &nbsp;Arghhhhh&#8230;.  &#8212;  I fly fish so therefore I am. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>My appointment at 8 am in Santa Fe went quickly and since a flyshop was  nearby and it was still early I drove by. &nbsp;They were open. &nbsp;That flyshop is  excellent. &nbsp;It&#8217;s one of those shops where all the employees and the owners  fish a lot and want you to have success. &nbsp;They&#8217;re also real experts on the  Rio Grande&#44; which I haven&#8217;t fished often. &nbsp;http://www.highdesertangler.com  The smoke from two fires in the Pecos got my attention on the drive from  Santa Fe to Taos&#44; where I had another appointment at 11:30. &nbsp;The Pecos is on  the east side of the highway and eventually the road rejoins the Rio Grande&#44;  which is on the west side of the highway. &nbsp;In Espanola a very well equipped  lowrider made a fast left at an intersection in front of me. &nbsp;With his  hydraulics he lifted just the inside front wheel up off the road. &nbsp;If you  can imagine the effect &#8211; it looked like the Monte Carlo was going to roll&#44;  but alas&#44; they just drove away laughing. &nbsp;Don&#8217;t let anyone kid you&#44; and with  all due respect to SoCal&#44; but Espanola NM is the birthplace and home of the  world&#8217;s best lowriders.  Since I had two and a half hours to make a one hour drive and the Orilla  Verde State Park appeared on my left&#44; of course I had to get out and fish on  my way to Taos.  New flyline review: &nbsp;the 555 5 weight double taper seemed to cast and shoot  great. &nbsp;Roll casting is a breeze&#44; even for a goofball caster like me. But  the tip sinks like any other line&#44; in fact probably worse.  It was early&#44; the only bugs around were tiny midges&#44; and the river is as low  as ever in any season. &nbsp;The huge caddis hatch had apparently come and gone&#44;  but armed with the advice from High Desert&#44; my plan was to fish little  hairwing peacock caddis and parachute adams and see how that went. &nbsp;After a  little prospecting and no success&#44; including adding a dropper&#44; I switched to  two nymphs&#44; a small pt and a sparkle pupa (good advice from the flyshop) and  I caught three large chubs&#44; two small trout and a large sucker that was  pretty cool. &nbsp;After my appointment the hiking and scenery were great&#44; but  the wind howled and it never got cool enough to get the fish going&#44; although  I got a nice brown in really fast water with a stimulator. &nbsp;Fished until  dark and bushwhacked back to my truck. &nbsp;Got home about midnight.  The San Juan was real fun. &nbsp;My friend was home from Maine and hadn&#8217;t fished  there in a long time. &nbsp;Hot sunny&#44; not too crowded. &nbsp;We fished Tuesday  evening and all day Wednesday. &nbsp;This fish is not great but there aren&#8217;t that  many browns way upstream in the San Juan:  http://home.earthlink.net/~royalwulff/web/BruceBrown2.jpg  And here&#8217;s a way to take a picture of a nice double when there&#8217;s only two of  you: &nbsp;http://home.earthlink.net/~royalwulff/web/TwoFishNets.jpg  Got home around 1 AM.  Thanks to RW for letting me mooch his webspace.  bruce h </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &lt;snipped   New flyline review: &nbsp;the 555 5 weight double taper seemed to cast and shoot   great. &nbsp;Roll casting is a breeze&#44; even for a goofball caster like me. But   the tip sinks like any other line&#44; in fact probably worse. </p>
<p>You have to make sure you seal that fly line before you use it. &nbsp;The core  can take on water and sink the line like that if you are not careful. &nbsp;I  had the same problem and just hung the line out to dry for a few days and  then sealed the end with some Aquaseal. &nbsp;   http://home.earthlink.net/~royalwulff/web/BruceBrown2.jpg   And here&#8217;s a way to take a picture of a nice double when there&#8217;s only two of   you: &nbsp;http://home.earthlink.net/~royalwulff/web/TwoFishNets.jpg </p>
<p>Nice pics Bruiser!  &#8212;  Warren  change addy to yahoo for email  Henry&#8217;s Fork Clave info  and Bozeman&#44; MT fishing info  http://www.geocities.com/troutbum_mt3/HFclave.html </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/tr-with-a-couple-pics-and-555-line-1614780.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>favorite leader and tipover material</title>
		<link>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/favorite-leader-and-tipover-material-1610786.html</link>
		<comments>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/favorite-leader-and-tipover-material-1610786.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fly Fishing Line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flyfishingfisherman.com/uncategorized/favorite-leader-and-tipover-material-1610786.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
Segar Grand Max is pretty hot right now. 
 &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; i like fluoracorbon material since the fish kant see it. &#160;its   expensive but works awsome. &#160;have you ever perchased florocarbon from   cabelas? &#160;is it good.  

Response:
  i like fluoracorbon material since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>Segar Grand Max is pretty hot right now. </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; i like fluoracorbon material since the fish kant see it. &nbsp;its   expensive but works awsome. &nbsp;have you ever perchased florocarbon from   cabelas? &nbsp;is it good.  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  i like fluoracorbon material since the fish kant see it. &nbsp;its   expensive but works awsome. &nbsp;have you ever perchased florocarbon from   cabelas? &nbsp;is it good. </p>
<p>Everyone I know whose fishing I respect uses the same old Maxima &#8211;  reliable&#44; strong&#44; doesn&#8217;t get in a twist.  LC  &#8212;  Lazarus Cooke </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  i like fluoracorbon material since the fish kant see it. </p>
<p>If a tree falls in the forest and nobody is around&#44; will berkeley hear it?  (the bishop of Cloyne&#44; not the tackle manufacturer in Iowa)  Mu </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  &lt;Crap snipped.  What you write&#44; is an affront to most people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/favorite-leader-and-tipover-material-1610786.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vest, chest pack, or Prince Albert can?</title>
		<link>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/vest.html</link>
		<comments>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/vest.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fly Fishing Line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flyfishingfisherman.com/uncategorized/vest.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
I&#8217;m about to replace my 15-year-old vest whose only remaining advantage is  that it looks &#34;seasoned.&#34;  What&#8217;s the vote of the lodge as to chest packs&#44; vests&#44; etc? I&#8217;m looking at  Filson because they use snaps instead of velcro&#44; which I&#8217;ve found to be  really awkward to handle one-handed. The main [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>I&#8217;m about to replace my 15-year-old vest whose only remaining advantage is  that it looks &quot;seasoned.&quot;  What&#8217;s the vote of the lodge as to chest packs&#44; vests&#44; etc? I&#8217;m looking at  Filson because they use snaps instead of velcro&#44; which I&#8217;ve found to be  really awkward to handle one-handed. The main thing I want is to be able to  carry my lunch/beverage/rain gear&#44; etc.&#44; along with a big supply of tackle  because I use the vest to store most of my gear (not that I have all that  much to store&#44; but I hate sorting it out before trips).  And can you still get Prince Albert in a can?  &#8212;  Bob Patton </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Hi All&#44;  It seems like there was a big push for chest packs the last 5 or more years&#44;  but lately traditional vests are selling better than ever?  We sell mostly shorter vests in Nor Cal because we have larger streams to  cross/wade and float tubing too.  &#8212;  Bill Kiene  Kiene&#8217;s Fly Shop  Sacramento&#44; CA&#44; USA  www.kiene.com </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; I&#8217;m about to replace my 15-year-old vest whose only remaining advantage is   that it looks &quot;seasoned.&quot;   What&#8217;s the vote of the lodge as to chest packs&#44; vests&#44; etc? I&#8217;m looking at   Filson because they use snaps instead of velcro&#44; which I&#8217;ve found to be   really awkward to handle one-handed. The main thing I want is to be able  to   carry my lunch/beverage/rain gear&#44; etc.&#44; along with a big supply of tackle   because I use the vest to store most of my gear (not that I have all that   much to store&#44; but I hate sorting it out before trips).   And can you still get Prince Albert in a can?   &#8212;   Bob Patton  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  And can you still get Prince Albert in a can?   &#8212;   Bob Patton </p>
<p>Yep. But you gotta get him really drunk first.  Pete aka Pogo  &#8212;  You need only two tools. WD-40 and duct tape. If it doesn&#8217;t move and  it should&#44; use WD-40. If it moves and shouldn&#8217;t&#44; use the tape.  &nbsp; &nbsp; C.Webster </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  What&#8217;s the vote of the lodge as to chest packs&#44; vests&#44; etc? I&#8217;m looking at   Filson because they use snaps instead of velcro&#44; which I&#8217;ve found to be   really awkward to handle one-handed. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s something nice about having a finely crafted piece of canvas&#44;  brass and leather hanging on your chest. &nbsp;I vote for the Filson.   The main thing I want is to be able to carry my lunch/beverage/rain   gear&#44; etc.&#44; along with a big supply of tackle because I use the vest   to store most of my gear (not that I have all that much to store&#44; but   I hate sorting it out before trips). </p>
<p>Yep. &nbsp;I keep all my trout gear in my chest pack and just leave it there.  The rear compartment of the Filson will hold my Hodgeman wading jacket  (their low-end nylon jacket) and a thermos (wide-mouth&#44; soup thermos&#44;  not a coffee-dispenser style).  Mu </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> There&#8217;s something nice about having a finely crafted piece of canvas&#44;  brass and leather hanging on your chest. &nbsp; </p>
<p>That sounds like a commercial for the Canadian version of Victoria&#8217;s  Secret. &lt;g  &#8212;  Charlie&#8230; </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> I&#8217;m about to replace my 15-year-old vest whose only remaining advantage is  that it looks &quot;seasoned.&quot;  What&#8217;s the vote of the lodge as to chest packs&#44; vests&#44; etc? I&#8217;m looking at  Filson because they use snaps instead of velcro&#44; which I&#8217;ve found to be  really awkward to handle one-handed. The main thing I want is to be able to  carry my lunch/beverage/rain gear&#44; etc.&#44; along with a big supply of tackle  because I use the vest to store most of my gear (not that I have all that  much to store&#44; but I hate sorting it out before trips).  And can you still get Prince Albert in a can? </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know about ol&#8217; Prince Albert but of late&#44; &nbsp;I&#8217;ve been using a  satchel. &nbsp;It&#8217;s a smallish bag designed for students with slots for  pens&#44; disks&#44; etc. &nbsp;Works great for all my paraphernalia &#8211; just clipped  a zinger and a drying patch on it and I was in business.  Peter  Visit The Streamer Page at http://home.cogeco.ca/~pcharles/streamers/index.html </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Ah&#44; yes . . . reminds me of a gal I saw once in a bar in Okinawa. And the  things she could do with a cigarette and a beer bottle . . . but that&#8217;s  another story . &nbsp;:-)  Bob </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  There&#8217;s something nice about having a finely crafted piece of canvas&#44;   brass and leather hanging on your chest.   That sounds like a commercial for the Canadian version of Victoria&#8217;s   Secret. &lt;g   &#8212;   Charlie&#8230;  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Thanks&#44; Bill. Seems like the vest distributes weight a little better. I  don&#8217;t have long legs and frequently manage to soak the bottom of my vest&#44;  but wonder how a loaded chest pack feels after a day of fishing. Expect I&#8217;ll  go with the vest.  Bob </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; Hi All&#44;   It seems like there was a big push for chest packs the last 5 or more  years&#44;   but lately traditional vests are selling better than ever?   We sell mostly shorter vests in Nor Cal because we have larger streams to   cross/wade and float tubing too.   &#8212;   Bill Kiene   Kiene&#8217;s Fly Shop   Sacramento&#44; CA&#44; USA   www.kiene.com    I&#8217;m about to replace my 15-year-old vest whose only remaining advantage  is    that it looks &quot;seasoned.&quot;    What&#8217;s the vote of the lodge as to chest packs&#44; vests&#44; etc? I&#8217;m looking  at    Filson because they use snaps instead of velcro&#44; which I&#8217;ve found to be    really awkward to handle one-handed. The main thing I want is to be able   to    carry my lunch/beverage/rain gear&#44; etc.&#44; along with a big supply of  tackle    because I use the vest to store most of my gear (not that I have all  that    much to store&#44; but I hate sorting it out before trips).    And can you still get Prince Albert in a can?    &#8212;    Bob Patton  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>The first tackle box I ever had was a tobacco can. Can&#8217;t remember if it was  Prince Albert or Half and Half&#44; but those cans were great. And If you were  eight years old you could sometimes find a few shreds of tobacco and really  live dangerously.  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   And can you still get Prince Albert in a can?    &#8212;    Bob Patton   Yep. But you gotta get him really drunk first.   Pete aka Pogo   &#8212;   You need only two tools. WD-40 and duct tape. If it doesn&#8217;t move and   it should&#44; use WD-40. If it moves and shouldn&#8217;t&#44; use the tape.   &nbsp; &nbsp; C.Webster  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Thanks for the info. The only trouble with the Filson is that it&#8217;s so  expensive it needs a special section in my will!  Bob  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   What&#8217;s the vote of the lodge as to chest packs&#44; vests&#44; etc? I&#8217;m looking  at    Filson because they use snaps instead of velcro&#44; which I&#8217;ve found to be    really awkward to handle one-handed.   There&#8217;s something nice about having a finely crafted piece of canvas&#44;   brass and leather hanging on your chest. &nbsp;I vote for the Filson.    The main thing I want is to be able to carry my lunch/beverage/rain    gear&#44; etc.&#44; along with a big supply of tackle because I use the vest    to store most of my gear (not that I have all that much to store&#44; but    I hate sorting it out before trips).   Yep. &nbsp;I keep all my trout gear in my chest pack and just leave it there.   The rear compartment of the Filson will hold my Hodgeman wading jacket   (their low-end nylon jacket) and a thermos (wide-mouth&#44; soup thermos&#44;   not a coffee-dispenser style).   Mu  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I glue them together back to back. &nbsp;I take two such assemblys and cut radial  notches in them and fit them together so they fit 90 degrees to each other.  Really cool on the Christmas tree&#44; almost as much fun as watching a lava  lamp. </p>
<p> . The CD&#44; of course&#44;  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; was immediately introduced to Ms Trash Can&#44; where it&#8217;s resting happily   and awaiting its fate.   &#8212;   rbc: &nbsp;vixen &nbsp; &nbsp;Fairly harmless   remove invalid or hit reply to email.   Though I&#8217;m very slow to respond.   http://www.visi.com/~cyli  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> Really cool on the Christmas tree&#44; almost as much fun as watching a lava  lamp. </p>
<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#8230;or watching paint dry&#44; which i will speculate is one of  your most challenging intellectual endeavors.  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; get it?  wayno </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>&lt;RWP mused and asked: &nbsp;What&#8217;s the vote of the lodge as to chest packs&#44;  vests&#44; etc?  Like most other things I usually want more than one solution to every  problem. &nbsp;I have this ordered from L.L. Bean but it won&#8217;t be available  til March 18th. &nbsp;I bought it for float tubing and deeper wading (I  keep soaking my current vest although is it a &quot;shorty&quot; wading model &#8212;  maybe cuz I stand only 5&#8242;8&quot; tall in stilettos).  TC21140 Olive Modular Fishing System Large Chest/Fanny  Pack&#8230;&#8230;$49.00  TC24057 Black Modular Fishing System Ultralight  Chris Fanning &#8212; still trying to buy his way to fly fishing bliss&#8230; </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Thanks to everybody for the ideas. I still dunno what the hell I&#8217;m going to  do. But you&#8217;un&#8217;s thoughts are helpful.  Bob  &#8212;  Bob Patton </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; &lt;RWP mused and asked: &nbsp;What&#8217;s the vote of the lodge as to chest packs&#44;   vests&#44; etc?   Like most other things I usually want more than one solution to every   problem. &nbsp;I have this ordered from L.L. Bean but it won&#8217;t be available   til March 18th. &nbsp;I bought it for float tubing and deeper wading (I   keep soaking my current vest although is it a &quot;shorty&quot; wading model &#8212;   maybe cuz I stand only 5&#8242;8&quot; tall in stilettos).   TC21140 Olive Modular Fishing System Large Chest/Fanny   Pack&#8230;&#8230;$49.00   TC24057 Black Modular Fishing System Ultralight   Chris Fanning &#8212; still trying to buy his way to fly fishing bliss&#8230;  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  I came home tonight and found that &#8216;resident&#8217; had been sent an AOL CD.   Nicely packaged in a thin metal container. &nbsp;YeeHaw. &nbsp;I&#8217;ve got a place   other than my hat to keep those tiny flies now. &nbsp;I grabbed a magnet   off the &#8216;frig and found out it&#8217;ll work just fine. The CD&#44; of course&#44;   was immediately introduced to Ms Trash Can&#44; where it&#8217;s resting happily   and awaiting its fate.   &#8212;   rbc: &nbsp;vixen &nbsp; &nbsp;Fairly harmless   remove invalid or hit reply to email.   Though I&#8217;m very slow to respond.   http://www.visi.com/~cyli </p>
<p>Wait for a second one&#44; put a spindle through them both&#44; and a small bolt or  similar on the rim of one&#44; put this in a simple stand&#44; and you have an  excellent linewinder. You can make a nice tool stand for fly-tying tools  etc&#44; in a similar way. Just drill holes around the rim&#44; and mount the disc  on a heavy bolt or similar.  Depending on the reflective material used&#44; they also make excellent lamp  reflectors. They should not be mounted too close to heat sources though.  If you buy a cheap electric clock motor&#44; mount it behind the disk&#44; and then  mount the hands&#44; then you have a nice wall clock.  Cutting notches around the rim of the disc&#44; turns it into a very handy cast  holder. These were very popular at one time.  If you glue a raised rim to the disc&#44; and partition the disc with further  strips ( like an apple tart decoration with pastry) of strip cork for  instance&#44; then you have a very handy stackable hook store.  There are lots of other uses for such high grade plastic discs. &nbsp;If AOL and  others want to give them away&#44; then I see no reason not to use them.  TL  MC </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> The first tackle box I ever had was a tobacco can. Can&#8217;t remember if it was  Prince Albert or Half and Half&#44; but those cans were great. And If you were  eight years old you could sometimes find a few shreds of tobacco and really  live dangerously. </p>
<p>I came home tonight and found that &#8216;resident&#8217; had been sent an AOL CD.  Nicely packaged in a thin metal container. &nbsp;YeeHaw. &nbsp;I&#8217;ve got a place  other than my hat to keep those tiny flies now. &nbsp;I grabbed a magnet  off the &#8216;frig and found out it&#8217;ll work just fine. The CD&#44; of course&#44;  was immediately introduced to Ms Trash Can&#44; where it&#8217;s resting happily  and awaiting its fate.  &#8212;  rbc: &nbsp;vixen &nbsp; &nbsp;Fairly harmless  remove invalid or hit reply to email.  Though I&#8217;m very slow to respond.  http://www.visi.com/~cyli </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> Check out the 2002 fly fishing cataloge from LL Bean they have some very nice  roomy sized fanny packs for about$ 49.00 they hold lots of gear and have a  great belt system &nbsp;keep a tight line </p>
<p>I have the LL Bean large chest pack with cargo strap&#44; and I can carry more  stuff than I could in my shorty vest&#44; and everything is better organized and  easier to find. Also&#44; the weight is more evenly distributed.  I also got the mesh strap for hot weather. I have tried using the pack with the  included belt as a fanny or hip pack&#44; but it just doesn&#8217;t feel right for some  reason. I really like it as a chest pack&#44; though.  George Adams  &quot;From the rockin&#8217; of the cradle to the rollin&#8217; of the hearse&#44; the goin&#8217; up was  worth the comin&#8217; down.&quot;  ___Kris Kristofferson &quot;The Pilgrim/Chapter 33&quot; </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  What&#8217;s the vote of the lodge as to chest packs&#44; vests&#44; etc? I&#8217;m looking at   Filson because they use snaps instead of velcro&#44; which I&#8217;ve found to be   really awkward to handle one-handed. The main thing I want is to be able to   carry my lunch/beverage/rain gear&#44; etc.&#44; along with a big supply of tackle   because I use the vest to store most of my gear (not that I have all that   much to store&#44; but I hate sorting it out before trips).   Bob Patton </p>
<p>Bob&#44;  &nbsp; I used the same vest for many years&#44; a Stearns inflatable model. &nbsp;Because of  the heavy cloth and the enclosed rubber bladders&#44; it was very hot in the  summer. &nbsp;I bought a &quot;Fishpond&quot; ($60.00) chest pack/hip pack a couple of years  ago. &nbsp;You can wear it either way. &nbsp;I needed to use the neck strap as I am &quot;hip  challenged&quot; and I couldn&#8217;t keep the thing from sliding down to my knees. &nbsp;The  pack works pretty well but when fully loaded&#44; sticks out quite a ways. &nbsp;I used  it mainly as a hip pack but used the shoulder strap to keep it from sliding  down. &nbsp;I didn&#8217;t like using it as a chest pack. &nbsp;Just always seemed to be in the  way.  &nbsp; On my way back home from the Yellowstone clave&#44; I treated myself to a Simms  mesh vest ($100.00). &nbsp;I like this vest better than the chest pack. &nbsp;The weight  is spread out very comfortably across the shoulders and holds everything I  need. &nbsp;It&#8217;s cut short for deep wading and seems to be the best compromise for  me. &nbsp;I needed to remove the chest pack when I rowed my pontoon and there&#8217;s  always a chance it will end up floating down the river.  Snoop  &#8212;  &#8212;&#8211;= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com&#44; Uncensored Usenet News =&#8212;&#8211;  http://www.newsfeeds.com &#8211; The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!  &#8212;&#8211;== &nbsp;Over 80&#44;000 Newsgroups &#8211; 16 Different Servers! =&#8212;&#8211; </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Check out the 2002 fly fishing cataloge from LL Bean they have some very nice  roomy sized fanny packs for about$ 49.00 they hold lots of gear and have a </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> Thanks for the info. The only trouble with the Filson is that it&#8217;s so  expensive it needs a special section in my will!  Bob </p>
<p>I used to use a Filson vest that I bought because I love those old  school Filson products; however&#44; it was way to heavy and the snaps  tended to stick shut in the cold&#8230;.one cold day in Yellowstone park&#44;  I couldn&#8217;t open the snap on one of the pockets and ripped the pocket  trying. &nbsp;Same day I bought my Simms vest in West and haven&#8217;t used the  Filson since.  Eugene K. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I just received a &quot;FlyTrap&quot; that I bought from ezflyfish.com. Looks like it  will beat the hell out of fleece and styrofoam patches.  Bob </p>
<p> //snip//   pens&#44; disks&#44; etc. &nbsp;Works great for all my paraphernalia &#8211; just clipped   a zinger and a drying patch on it and I was in business.   Peter   Visit The Streamer Page at </p>
<p>http://home.cogeco.ca/~pcharles/streamers/index.html </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/vest.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To All</title>
		<link>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/to-all-1605366.html</link>
		<comments>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/to-all-1605366.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fly Fishing Line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flyfishingfisherman.com/uncategorized/to-all-1605366.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
&#160; &#160; It is now the a.m. where in I can actually recognize the keyboard as a  keyboard&#44; not a checkers board. &#160;The FBI has left my door and life is  getting back to normal (who knew that using a keyboard as a checker board  would hit the right url and password [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; It is now the a.m. where in I can actually recognize the keyboard as a  keyboard&#44; not a checkers board. &nbsp;The FBI has left my door and life is  getting back to normal (who knew that using a keyboard as a checker board  would hit the right url and password to deploy the black helicopters to  Stewart&#44; Iowa?).  &nbsp; &nbsp; I want to wish you all a happy New Year. &nbsp;This has been a tremendous  year of growth in my fly fishing skill&#44; due in no small part to ROFFians.  The Pirate&#8217;s School of Fishing With Floaty Pieces of Yarn&#44; followed by Mike  Makela&#8217;s School of Stare at the Water and Will the Fish onto your Hook (Zen  subdivision) taught me nymphing. &nbsp;Petah and the Pirate&#44; after watching me go  fishless all day&#44; telling me I&#8217;ve got too much bow in my line (&#8216;cudda said  something earlier). &nbsp;Wayno threatening to beat me silly if I flexed my wrist  on my back cast. &nbsp;Tony Norton getting me out on skinny water so I could  learn stealth.  &nbsp; &nbsp; Did I fish as much as I wanted to this year? No. &nbsp;Did I more than make  up for it with new friends that accept me as me? Yes. &nbsp; Folks who open their  homes like Dave and Jo&#44; Wayne and Dianna. &nbsp;Guys who haul me from spot to  spot like Stan&#44; and the whole Boston Massacre II Clave crew. &nbsp;Not one had  ever met me&#44; but you all came out to fish with me. &nbsp;To Penns and  Rappahannock crew and to all of you I&#8217;ve yet to fish with&#44; to those who put  in the wonderful TR&#8217;s and advice&#44; even to those who&#8217;ve added a bit of  controversy the group&#44; I wish you all the best in the coming year.  &#8212;  Frank Reid  Reverse email to reply. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Frank&#44; the pleasure was all mine. &nbsp;I enjoyed your company and fishing with you.  &nbsp;I have named that pool on the Penns &quot;The Frank Pool&quot;. &nbsp; &nbsp;And&#44; Jo and I are  enjoying the quilt. &nbsp;  Best Wishes for a safe and wonderful New Year to you and yours&#44; Frank. &nbsp;Hope to  see you at Penns.  Dave </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> Frank&#44; the pleasure was all mine. &nbsp;I enjoyed your company and fishing with you.   I have named that pool on the Penns &quot;The Frank Pool&quot;. &nbsp; &nbsp;And&#44; Jo and I are  enjoying the quilt. &nbsp;  Best Wishes for a safe and wonderful New Year to you and yours&#44; Frank. &nbsp;Hope to  see you at Penns.  Dave </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll echo those comments &#8211; see you at Penns&#44; beside the Frank Pool.  Peter  Visit The Streamer Page at http://home.cogeco.ca/~pcharles/streamers/index.html </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/to-all-1605366.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Almost off topic&#8230;.was Hooks On Planes</title>
		<link>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/almost-off-topic-was-hooks-on-planes-1596054.html</link>
		<comments>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/almost-off-topic-was-hooks-on-planes-1596054.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fly Fishing Line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flyfishingfisherman.com/uncategorized/almost-off-topic-was-hooks-on-planes-1596054.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
    In these trying times&#44; when there has to be just one more way to make  yet    another dollar&#44; I sense a marketing opportunity.   Let me guess. You&#8217;re going to hire &#34;mules&#34; to smuggle hooks on   airplanes. I suppose they&#8217;ll have to swallow them. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>    In these trying times&#44; when there has to be just one more way to make  yet    another dollar&#44; I sense a marketing opportunity.   Let me guess. You&#8217;re going to hire &quot;mules&quot; to smuggle hooks on   airplanes. I suppose they&#8217;ll have to swallow them. </p>
<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Even better. These are high tech stainless hooks&#44; so they aren&#8217;t  dissolved by stomach acids. All the mule has to do is swallow them&#44; then get  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;I was in with you on this one RW&#44; but maybe we ought to think it a  little more.  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Charlie&#44;  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; at least I hope they&#8217;re barbless </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I take that back&#44; I bet the right marketer could have offices in every major  airport within two years&#8230;..who wants to hear my idea?  john </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> I take that back&#44; I bet the right marketer could have offices in every major  airport within two years&#8230;..who wants to hear my idea?  john </p>
<p>fire away&#44; I&#8217;m on pins and needles &nbsp;. . .  Peter  Visit The Streamer Page at http://home.cogeco.ca/~pcharles/streamers/index.html </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &#8230;..who wants to hear my idea? </p>
<p>Shoot. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>we&#8217;re waiting  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Handyman  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Mike </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  In these trying times&#44; when there has to be just one more way to make yet   another dollar&#44; I sense a marketing opportunity. </p>
<p>Let me guess. You&#8217;re going to hire &quot;mules&quot; to smuggle hooks on  airplanes. I suppose they&#8217;ll have to swallow them.  &#8212;  visit my web site:  http://home.earthlink.net/~royalwulff/ </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>In these trying times&#44; when there has to be just one more way to make yet  another dollar&#44; I sense a marketing opportunity. Somewhere along the line of  two or three hundred dollars and flight&#8230;.for the airlines.  Anybody in here close enough to that industry to let me bend their ear a  bit? &nbsp;I mean this marvelous idea came from discussing fly fishing&#44; so this  post is only kinda sorta off topic.  There is no profit or gain for you or I. I just have a question.  john </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/almost-off-topic-was-hooks-on-planes-1596054.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Little help with casting technique?</title>
		<link>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/little-help-with-casting-technique-1597824.html</link>
		<comments>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/little-help-with-casting-technique-1597824.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fly Fishing Line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flyfishingfisherman.com/uncategorized/little-help-with-casting-technique-1597824.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
   I&#8217;m relatively new to fly casting and have a question regarding   casting technique. &#160;When I transition from backcast to forecast I   often hear the fly and line cracking (poping really) like a whip when   the fly reverses direction to go forward. &#160;Is this normal? &#160;I suspect [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>   I&#8217;m relatively new to fly casting and have a question regarding   casting technique. &nbsp;When I transition from backcast to forecast I   often hear the fly and line cracking (poping really) like a whip when   the fly reverses direction to go forward. &nbsp;Is this normal? &nbsp;I suspect   that I&#8217;m not letting the line straighten behind me before casting   forward; therefore&#44; it&#8217;s just like cracking a whip. &nbsp;The problem with   waiting though seems to be that the line doesn&#8217;t travel forward as far   if I wait. &nbsp;The problem with not waiting&#44; I seem to be jerking the   stuffing out of my flys. &nbsp;Any thoughts? </p>
<p>Yes; what everybody else told you and this. &nbsp; To get distance on the forward  cast&#44; you need to load the rod properly. &nbsp; When your back cast straightens  behind you (no big loops)&#44; start the forward cast a bit more slowly until  the rod begins to load from the weight of the line&#44; THEN apply all that  power you&#8217;re using. &nbsp; Don&#8217;t give it the full magilla all at once. &nbsp; It  should be a gradual acceleration&#44; not a sharp increase to full power.  Joe F. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> I&#8217;m relatively new to fly casting and have a question regarding  casting technique. &nbsp;When I transition from backcast to forecast I  often hear the fly and line cracking (poping really) like a whip when  the fly reverses direction to go forward. &nbsp;Is this normal? &nbsp;I suspect  that I&#8217;m not letting the line straighten behind me before casting  forward; therefore&#44; it&#8217;s just like cracking a whip. &nbsp;The problem with  waiting though seems to be that the line doesn&#8217;t travel forward as far  if I wait. &nbsp;The problem with not waiting&#44; I seem to be jerking the  stuffing out of my flys. &nbsp;Any thoughts? </p>
<p>Well&#44; first&#44; quit stuffing your fly &#8211; it&#8217;ll make the girls (or the  boys&#44; depending on your personal choices) think you silly &#8211; and that  way&#44; you&#8217;ll not jerk it out. &nbsp;Hmm&#8230;that reminds me of Blazing Saddles  &#8211; &quot;pardon me while I whip this out&#8230;&#44;&quot; and speaking of whipping&#8230;.  &#8230;yup&#44; &quot;cracking the whip&quot; is timing. &nbsp;Turn your head and look over  your shoulder at the fly &#8211; and for Pete&#8217;s (or really&#44; the Canadian of  your choice) sake&#44; don&#8217;t use full-hook flies to practice &#8211; try using  bright&#44; puffy whiffs &#8211; and try beginning your forward cast when the  fly begins to start into the loop&#8217;s roll. &nbsp;I suspect your particular  distance thing is timing-related&#44; as well&#44; due to timing because of  &lt;oh&#44; lord&#44; well&#44; let&#8217;s just say it&#8217;s likely timing-related&#44; but  without more info and seeing you cast&#44; I&#8217;ll make that guess and leave  it at that. &nbsp;  Just stay with it&#44; you&#8217;ll get it &#8211; practice&#44; practice&#44; and oh&#44; BTW&#44;  practice.  TC&#44;  R  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -Regards&#44;  Eric  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   &#8230;. load&#8230;   &lt;oh lord &nbsp;He said it! &nbsp;He said it!   &lt;G   TC&#44;   R   Where&#8217;s that duck dropping from the lights? </p>
<p>Well&#44; you&#8217;re a lovely couple and I think you should get married.  Wolfgang  somewhere in the viaduct </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   &#8230;. load&#8230;   &lt;oh lord &nbsp;He said it! &nbsp;He said it!   &lt;G   TC&#44;   R   Where&#8217;s that duck dropping from the lights? </p>
<p>LOL. &nbsp; In keeping with the oft-dispensed advice&#44; I thought long and hard  before hitting the send key on that one. &nbsp; Thought I could slip it benignly  past if I omitted all controversial adverbs.  Joe F. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  &#8230;. load&#8230;   &lt;oh lord &nbsp;He said it! &nbsp;He said it!   &lt;G   TC&#44;   R   Where&#8217;s that duck dropping from the lights?  Well&#44; you&#8217;re a lovely couple and I think you should get married. </p>
<p>Why would I wanna marry a duck&#44; via whatever means&#8230;oh&#44; you just want  the film rights so you can sell the tape&#8230;.on eBay&#8230;.  TC&#44;  R  fearing the ductile nature of threads&#8230;.  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -Wolfgang  somewhere in the viaduct  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Via duck&#44; vie not a turkey or a chicken?  Op </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   &#8230;. load&#8230;    &lt;oh lord &nbsp;He said it! &nbsp;He said it!    &lt;G    TC&#44;    R    Where&#8217;s that duck dropping from the lights?   Well&#44; you&#8217;re a lovely couple and I think you should get married.   Wolfgang   somewhere in the viaduct  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  I&#8217;m relatively new to fly casting and have a question regarding   casting technique. &nbsp;When I transition from backcast to forecast I   often hear the fly and line cracking (poping really) like a whip when   the fly reverses direction to go forward. &nbsp;Is this normal? </p>
<p>No  It&#8217;s really hard to fix your problem by suggesting &nbsp;possible solution with  words alone. &nbsp;You may want to rent a casting video from a local fly  fishing shop. &nbsp;If the line droops when you do try to let it completely  unroll on the backcast&#44; try aiming your backcast a little bit up and to  the back and not just to the back. &nbsp;HTH.  Mu </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  I&#8217;m relatively new to fly casting and have a question regarding   casting technique. &nbsp;When I transition from backcast to forecast I   often hear the fly and line cracking (poping really) like a whip when   the fly reverses direction to go forward. &nbsp;Is this normal? &nbsp;I suspect   that I&#8217;m not letting the line straighten behind me before casting   forward; therefore&#44; it&#8217;s just like cracking a whip. &nbsp;The problem with   waiting though seems to be that the line doesn&#8217;t travel forward as far   if I wait. &nbsp;The problem with not waiting&#44; I seem to be jerking the   stuffing out of my flys. &nbsp;Any thoughts?   Regards&#44;   Eric </p>
<p>Eric:  Something that helped me alot was waiting until I felt the rod &quot;load up&quot;  on my back stroke. I also notice this is easier to feel with a &quot;slower&quot;  rod.  Just a thought.  M. Wm. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Casting next to big picture windows&#8230;.the solar tinted kind that act like  mirrors&#8230;can aid in watching how your line behaves while it&#8217;s behinds you.  I&#8217;m just a not very sensitive guy. It seems like my hands take forever to  learn something&#8230;.I mean you should have seen the hook and weight  contraption I had to build just to learn how to tie bloodknots. &nbsp;Having  acces to one of these type of windows helped me learn to cast (not that I  can). Being able to see when I was supposed to be feeling my line assisted  me in actually learning to feel it.  john </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; I&#8217;m relatively new to fly casting and have a question regarding   casting technique. &nbsp;When I transition from backcast to forecast I   often hear the fly and line cracking (poping really) like a whip when   the fly reverses direction to go forward. &nbsp;Is this normal? &nbsp;I suspect   that I&#8217;m not letting the line straighten behind me before casting   forward; therefore&#44; it&#8217;s just like cracking a whip. &nbsp;The problem with   waiting though seems to be that the line doesn&#8217;t travel forward as far   if I wait. &nbsp;The problem with not waiting&#44; I seem to be jerking the   stuffing out of my flys. &nbsp;Any thoughts?   Regards&#44;   Eric  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &#8230;. load&#8230; </p>
<p>&lt;oh lord &nbsp;He said it! &nbsp;He said it!  &lt;G  TC&#44;  R  Where&#8217;s that duck dropping from the lights?  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -Joe F.  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   I&#8217;m relatively new to fly casting and have a question regarding   casting technique. &nbsp;When I transition from backcast to forecast I   often hear the fly and line cracking (poping really) like a whip when   the fly reverses direction to go forward. &nbsp;Is this normal? &nbsp;I suspect   that I&#8217;m not letting the line straighten behind me before casting   forward; therefore&#44; it&#8217;s just like cracking a whip. &nbsp;The problem with   waiting though seems to be that the line doesn&#8217;t travel forward as far   if I wait. &nbsp;The problem with not waiting&#44; I seem to be jerking the   stuffing out of my flys. &nbsp;Any thoughts?   Regards&#44;   Eric </p>
<p>If the fly &quot;cracks&quot; when you commence your forward cast&#44; this is a result of  it breaking the sound barrier when it &quot;goes around the bend&quot;. This will  shred most flies very quickly indeed&#44; if it does not break them off to start  with. This is caused by you reversing direction&#44; and applying forward motion  to the fly&#44; while it is still travelling backwards.  The fault is indeed caused by starting the forward stroke too soon. &nbsp;This is  often compounded by allowing the rod to &quot;drift&quot; too far back&#44; or indeed a  power stroke which is too long.  Too much power is also a cause of this fault.  The remedy is to apply less power&#44; stop your backast a little earlier&#44; and  wait for the line to straighten before commencing the forward stroke.  Concentrate on throwing your backcast &quot;up&quot;&#44; instead of &quot;back&quot;&#44; and the fault  will probably disappear. &nbsp;Watching your back-cast will help here.  When the line is straight out behind you&#44; commence the forward stroke. When  casting heavy flies&#44; or greater distances&#44; a &quot;single haul&quot; may be of  considerable assistance. This is a pull on the line with the &quot;line&quot; hand&#44; at  the start of the forward stroke.  TL  MC </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   I&#8217;m relatively new to fly casting and have a question regarding   casting technique. &nbsp;When I transition from backcast to forecast I   often hear the fly and line cracking (poping really) like a whip when   the fly reverses direction to go forward. &nbsp;Is this normal? </p>
<p>It means MAXIMUM POWER!!!   &nbsp;I suspect   that I&#8217;m not letting the line straighten behind me before casting   forward; therefore&#44; it&#8217;s just like cracking a whip. &nbsp;The problem with   waiting though seems to be that the line doesn&#8217;t travel forward as far   if I wait. </p>
<p>Just kidding. &nbsp;It&#8217;s bad. &nbsp;You definitely need to wait. &nbsp;Stick with it &#8211;  maybe take a lesson &#8211; you will definitely be able to generate line speed  other ways. &nbsp; You&#8217;re not trying to cast like 80 feet&#44; are you? </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &nbsp; I&#8217;m relatively new to fly casting and have a question regarding   casting technique. &nbsp;When I transition from backcast to forecast I   often hear the fly and line cracking (poping really) like a whip when   the fly reverses direction to go forward. &nbsp;Is this normal? &nbsp;I suspect   that I&#8217;m not letting the line straighten behind me before casting   forward; therefore&#44; it&#8217;s just like cracking a whip. &nbsp;The problem with   waiting though seems to be that the line doesn&#8217;t travel forward as far   if I wait. &nbsp;The problem with not waiting&#44; I seem to be jerking the   stuffing out of my flys. &nbsp;Any thoughts? </p>
<p>It sounds like your analysis is correct. &nbsp;This is not normal and you should  try and let the line straighten out behind you. &nbsp;Perhaps you can add a  little haul on the &nbsp;forward cast to get more distance if it is a problem.  I haven&#8217;t seen you cast and I am not a &quot;casting coach&#44;&quot; other than to some  of my friends I am trying to teach&#44; so take my advice for what it is worth.  You get what you pay for and all that. . . <img src='http://flyfishingfisherman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   Perhaps some of the better casters will chime in with their opinions.  &#8212;  Warren Findley  Remove (nospamZZ) to respond via email  http://www.geocities.com/troutbum_mt/ </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I&#8217;m relatively new to fly casting and have a question regarding  casting technique. &nbsp;When I transition from backcast to forecast I  often hear the fly and line cracking (poping really) like a whip when  the fly reverses direction to go forward. &nbsp;Is this normal? &nbsp;I suspect  that I&#8217;m not letting the line straighten behind me before casting  forward; therefore&#44; it&#8217;s just like cracking a whip. &nbsp;The problem with  waiting though seems to be that the line doesn&#8217;t travel forward as far  if I wait. &nbsp;The problem with not waiting&#44; I seem to be jerking the  stuffing out of my flys. &nbsp;Any thoughts?  Regards&#44;  Eric </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flyfishingfisherman.com/fly-fishing-line/little-help-with-casting-technique-1597824.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

